PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BGC vs. JPM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BGC vs. JPM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BGC Group Inc. (BGC) and JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BGC achieves a 29.51% return, which is significantly higher than JPM's 10.73% return. Over the past 10 years, BGC has underperformed JPM with an annualized return of 7.36%, while JPM has yielded a comparatively higher 21.80% annualized return.


BGC

1D
-1.37%
1M
4.54%
6M
26.95%
YTD
29.51%
1Y
22.54%
3Y*
36.29%
5Y*
17.14%
10Y*
7.36%
ALL TIME*
-2.18%

JPM

1D
0.27%
1M
5.65%
6M
16.11%
YTD
10.73%
1Y
23.90%
3Y*
33.72%
5Y*
21.31%
10Y*
21.80%
ALL TIME*
12.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$25.51M$27.32M$37.24M
$2.69B$3.19B$3.04B

BGC vs. JPM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BGC
BGC Group Inc.
29.51%-0.58%26.46%92.20%-18.92%16.25%-32.66%14.89%-46.79%47.70%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
10.73%37.27%44.29%30.63%-12.64%27.75%-5.53%47.26%-6.62%26.76%

Correlation

The correlation between BGC and JPM is 0.30, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.41

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 1999

0.39

The correlation between BGC and JPM shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (1 year) to 0.46 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BGC:

$5.47B

JPM:

$942.62B

EPS

BGC:

$0.40

JPM:

$23.29

PE Ratio

BGC:

28.65

JPM:

15.10

PEG Ratio

BGC:

0.75

JPM:

1.67

PS Ratio

BGC:

1.65

JPM:

3.30

PB Ratio

BGC:

4.99

JPM:

2.78

Total Revenue (TTM)

BGC:

$3.35B

JPM:

$297.63B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BGC:

$1.03B

JPM:

$186.33B

EBITDA (TTM)

BGC:

$457.42M

JPM:

$90.84B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BGC vs. JPM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BGC
BGC Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
BGC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BGC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
BGC Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
BGC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
BGC Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

JPM
JPM Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
JPM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPM Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
JPM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPM Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BGC vs. JPM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BGC Group Inc. (BGC) and JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BGCJPMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.17

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.22

1.36

-0.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.40

3.24

-0.84

BGC vs. JPM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BGC Sharpe Ratio is 0.82, which is comparable to the JPM Sharpe Ratio of 0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BGC and JPM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BGC vs. JPM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BGC drawdown since its inception was -98.31%, which is greater than JPM's maximum drawdown of -76.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGC and JPM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BGCJPMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.31%

-76.16%

-22.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.77%

-15.47%

-5.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.46%

-24.42%

-10.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.99%

-38.77%

-8.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-79.67%

-43.63%

-36.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-77.86%

-1.54%

-76.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-86.85%

-17.56%

-69.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.56%

6.51%

+4.05%

Volatility

BGC vs. JPM - Volatility Comparison

BGC Group Inc. (BGC) has a higher volatility of 8.01% compared to JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) at 6.60%. This indicates that BGC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JPM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BGCJPMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.01%

6.60%

+1.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.12%

16.70%

+9.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.37%

22.50%

+8.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.26%

24.46%

+13.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.42%

27.33%

+13.09%

Dividends

BGC vs. JPM - Dividend Comparison

BGC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.69%, less than JPM's 1.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BGC
BGC Group Inc.
0.69%0.90%0.77%0.28%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.71%1.72%1.92%2.38%2.98%2.34%2.83%2.37%2.54%1.91%2.13%2.54%

Financials

BGC vs. JPM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between BGC Group Inc. and JPMorgan Chase & Co.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


BGC and JPM have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BGC has higher volatility (8.01%) compared to JPM (6.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BGC dropped -98.31% vs JPM's -76.16%.

JPM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.94 vs 0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BGC and JPM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer