PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BGC vs. JPM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BGC vs. JPM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BGC Group Inc. (BGC) and JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BGC achieves a 16.25% return, which is significantly higher than JPM's -5.70% return. Over the past 10 years, BGC has underperformed JPM with an annualized return of 1.63%, while JPM has yielded a comparatively higher 19.77% annualized return.


BGC

1D
-1.05%
1M
-8.08%
YTD
16.25%
6M
21.27%
1Y
12.23%
3Y*
36.00%
5Y*
11.59%
10Y*
1.63%

JPM

1D
1.48%
1M
-3.68%
YTD
-5.70%
6M
-1.30%
1Y
15.93%
3Y*
31.89%
5Y*
15.50%
10Y*
19.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BGC vs. JPM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BGC
BGC Group Inc.
16.25%-0.58%26.46%92.20%-18.92%16.25%-32.66%14.89%-65.78%47.70%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
-5.70%37.27%44.29%30.63%-12.64%27.75%-5.53%47.26%-6.62%26.76%

Correlation

The correlation between BGC and JPM is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 1999

0.39

The correlation between BGC and JPM shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (1 year) to 0.46 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

BGC:

$0.51

JPM:

$21.08

PE Ratio

BGC:

20.30

JPM:

14.28

PEG Ratio

BGC:

0.53

JPM:

1.58

PS Ratio

BGC:

1.14

JPM:

2.95

Total Revenue (TTM)

BGC:

$3.27B

JPM:

$285.09B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BGC:

$1.36B

JPM:

$173.52B

EBITDA (TTM)

BGC:

$315.57M

JPM:

$81.46B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BGC vs. JPM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BGC
BGC Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
BGC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BGC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
BGC Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
BGC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
BGC Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

JPM
JPM Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
JPM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPM Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
JPM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPM Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BGC vs. JPM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BGC Group Inc. (BGC) and JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BGCJPMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.44

0.75

-0.31

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.84

1.10

-0.27

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.14

-0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.53

1.05

-0.52

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.02

2.52

-1.50

BGC vs. JPM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BGC Sharpe Ratio is 0.44, which is lower than the JPM Sharpe Ratio of 0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BGC and JPM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BGCJPMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

0.75

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

0.64

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.04

0.72

-0.69

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.09

0.34

-0.43

Drawdowns

BGC vs. JPM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BGC drawdown since its inception was -98.31%, which is greater than JPM's maximum drawdown of -76.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGC and JPM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BGCJPMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.31%

-76.16%

-22.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.25%

-15.47%

-7.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.46%

-24.42%

-10.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-51.80%

-38.77%

-13.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-86.93%

-43.63%

-43.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-87.22%

-9.60%

-77.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-88.08%

-17.63%

-70.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.12%

6.43%

+5.69%

Volatility

BGC vs. JPM - Volatility Comparison

BGC Group Inc. (BGC) has a higher volatility of 7.73% compared to JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) at 6.55%. This indicates that BGC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JPM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BGCJPMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.73%

6.55%

+1.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.69%

17.21%

+4.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.24%

21.41%

+6.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.04%

24.41%

+13.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.98%

27.38%

+14.60%

Dividends

BGC vs. JPM - Dividend Comparison

BGC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%, less than JPM's 1.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BGC
BGC Group Inc.
0.77%0.90%0.77%0.28%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.96%1.72%1.92%2.38%2.98%2.34%2.83%2.37%2.54%1.91%2.13%2.54%

Financials

BGC vs. JPM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between BGC Group Inc. and JPMorgan Chase & Co.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B20222023202420252026
955.48M
73.66B
(BGC) Total Revenue
(JPM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

BGC vs. JPM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between BGC Group Inc. and JPMorgan Chase & Co. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%202220232024202520260
64.3%
Portfolio components
BGC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BGC Group Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 955.48M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

JPM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, JPMorgan Chase & Co. reported a gross profit of 47.33B and revenue of 73.66B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 64.3%.

BGC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BGC Group Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 955.48M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

JPM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, JPMorgan Chase & Co. reported an operating income of 20.48B and revenue of 73.66B, resulting in an operating margin of 27.8%.

BGC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BGC Group Inc. reported a net income of 84.15M and revenue of 955.48M, resulting in a net margin of 8.8%.

JPM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, JPMorgan Chase & Co. reported a net income of 16.49B and revenue of 73.66B, resulting in a net margin of 22.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BGC and JPM have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BGC has higher volatility (7.73%) compared to JPM (6.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BGC dropped -98.31% vs JPM's -76.16%.

JPM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.75 vs 0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BGC and JPM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer