PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BGC vs. KRE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BGC vs. KRE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BGC Group Inc. (BGC) and SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF (KRE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BGC vs. KRE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BGC
BGC Group Inc.
10.42%-0.58%26.46%92.20%-18.92%16.25%-32.66%14.89%-65.78%47.70%
KRE
SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF
2.20%10.21%18.58%-7.61%-15.08%39.29%-7.43%27.44%-18.81%7.49%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BGC achieves a 10.42% return, which is significantly higher than KRE's 2.20% return. Over the past 10 years, BGC has underperformed KRE with an annualized return of 1.05%, while KRE has yielded a comparatively higher 8.41% annualized return.


BGC

1D
0.61%
1M
0.31%
YTD
10.42%
6M
6.74%
1Y
7.65%
3Y*
24.36%
5Y*
14.82%
10Y*
1.05%

KRE

1D
1.07%
1M
-2.25%
YTD
2.20%
6M
5.84%
1Y
19.68%
3Y*
17.90%
5Y*
2.46%
10Y*
8.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BGC vs. KRE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BGC
BGC Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
BGC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BGC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
BGC Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
BGC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
BGC Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

KRE
KRE Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
KRE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KRE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
KRE Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
KRE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
KRE Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BGC vs. KRE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BGC Group Inc. (BGC) and SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF (KRE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BGCKREDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.23

0.70

-0.47

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.58

1.09

-0.51

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.16

-0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.35

1.26

-0.90

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.67

3.11

-2.44

BGC vs. KRE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BGC Sharpe Ratio is 0.23, which is lower than the KRE Sharpe Ratio of 0.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BGC and KRE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BGCKREDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

0.70

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

0.08

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.03

0.26

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.10

0.12

-0.22

Correlation

The correlation between BGC and KRE is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

BGC vs. KRE - Dividend Comparison

BGC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%, less than KRE's 2.39% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BGC
BGC Group Inc.
0.81%0.90%0.77%0.28%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
KRE
SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF
2.39%2.45%2.59%2.99%2.51%1.97%2.78%2.21%2.48%1.40%1.40%1.80%

Drawdowns

BGC vs. KRE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BGC drawdown since its inception was -98.31%, which is greater than KRE's maximum drawdown of -68.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGC and KRE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BGCKREDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.31%

-68.54%

-29.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.25%

-14.95%

-8.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-51.80%

-52.69%

+0.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-86.93%

-54.92%

-32.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-87.86%

-10.05%

-77.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-88.09%

-22.04%

-66.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.27%

6.03%

+6.24%

Volatility

BGC vs. KRE - Volatility Comparison

BGC Group Inc. (BGC) has a higher volatility of 8.41% compared to SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF (KRE) at 5.39%. This indicates that BGC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KRE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BGCKREDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.41%

5.39%

+3.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.06%

17.96%

+3.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.03%

28.14%

+4.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.55%

30.07%

+8.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.89%

31.96%

+9.93%