BGC vs. NWG
BGC (BGC Group Inc. ) and NWG (NatWest Group plc) are both stocks. Both are in the Financial Services sector — BGC in Capital Markets, NWG in Banks - Diversified. Over the past 10 years, BGC returned 1.44%/yr vs 14.32%/yr for NWG. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BGC vs. NWG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BGC achieves a 14.11% return, which is significantly higher than NWG's -5.66% return. Over the past 10 years, BGC has underperformed NWG with an annualized return of 1.44%, while NWG has yielded a comparatively higher 14.32% annualized return.
BGC
- 1D
- -1.84%
- 1M
- -9.13%
- YTD
- 14.11%
- 6M
- 16.19%
- 1Y
- 10.29%
- 3Y*
- 35.16%
- 5Y*
- 11.18%
- 10Y*
- 1.44%
NWG
- 1D
- -1.98%
- 1M
- 4.97%
- YTD
- -5.66%
- 6M
- -0.96%
- 1Y
- 16.03%
- 3Y*
- 42.89%
- 5Y*
- 29.37%
- 10Y*
- 14.32%
BGC vs. NWG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGC BGC Group Inc. | 14.11% | -0.58% | 26.46% | 92.20% | -18.92% | 16.25% | -32.66% | 14.89% | -65.78% | 47.70% |
NWG NatWest Group plc | -5.66% | 81.29% | 92.31% | -4.69% | 11.23% | 39.24% | -24.92% | 29.18% | -26.25% | 38.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between BGC and NWG is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2007 | 0.38 |
The correlation between BGC and NWG shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (1 year) to 0.39 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
BGC:
$0.51
NWG:
$2.95
BGC:
19.93
NWG:
5.36
BGC:
0.52
NWG:
0.20
BGC:
1.12
NWG:
1.09
BGC:
$3.27B
NWG:
$29.58B
BGC:
$1.36B
NWG:
$16.97B
BGC:
$315.57M
NWG:
$9.10B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BGC vs. NWG — Risk / Return Rank
BGC
NWG
BGC vs. NWG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BGC Group Inc. (BGC) and NatWest Group plc (NWG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BGC | NWG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.11 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.44 | 0.67 | -0.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.85 | 1.69 | -0.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BGC | NWG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 | 0.52 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 | 0.88 | -0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.03 | 0.37 | -0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.09 | -0.11 | +0.01 |
Drawdowns
BGC vs. NWG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BGC drawdown since its inception was -98.31%, roughly equal to the maximum NWG drawdown of -96.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGC and NWG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BGC | NWG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.31% | -96.96% | -1.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.25% | -24.03% | +0.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.46% | -34.62% | +0.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.80% | -40.56% | -11.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -86.93% | -67.34% | -19.59% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -87.46% | -71.59% | -15.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -88.08% | -86.23% | -1.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.15% | 9.53% | +2.62% |
Volatility
BGC vs. NWG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BGC Group Inc. (BGC) is 7.86%, while NatWest Group plc (NWG) has a volatility of 9.69%. This indicates that BGC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NWG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BGC | NWG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.86% | 9.69% | -1.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.76% | 23.75% | -1.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.30% | 31.20% | -2.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.05% | 33.51% | +4.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.97% | 38.31% | +3.66% |
Dividends
BGC vs. NWG - Dividend Comparison
BGC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%, less than NWG's 5.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGC BGC Group Inc. | 0.79% | 0.90% | 0.77% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NWG NatWest Group plc | 5.53% | 3.69% | 4.36% | 9.42% | 11.57% | 2.74% | 4.59% | 9.75% | 0.91% |
Financials
BGC vs. NWG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between BGC Group Inc. and NatWest Group plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BGC vs. NWG - Profitability Comparison
BGC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BGC Group Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 955.48M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
NWG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NatWest Group plc reported a gross profit of 4.36B and revenue of 7.39B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.0%.
BGC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BGC Group Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 955.48M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
NWG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NatWest Group plc reported an operating income of 2.03B and revenue of 7.39B, resulting in an operating margin of 27.5%.
BGC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BGC Group Inc. reported a net income of 84.15M and revenue of 955.48M, resulting in a net margin of 8.8%.
NWG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NatWest Group plc reported a net income of 1.51B and revenue of 7.39B, resulting in a net margin of 20.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BGC and NWG have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NWG has higher volatility (9.69%) compared to BGC (7.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BGC dropped -98.31% vs NWG's -96.96%.
NWG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.52 vs 0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BGC and NWG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer