ES vs. FLPKX

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Eversource Energy (ES) and Fidelity Low-Priced Stock Fund Class K (FLPKX).

FLPKX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on May 9, 2008.

Performance

ES vs. FLPKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eversource Energy (ES) and Fidelity Low-Priced Stock Fund Class K (FLPKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ES vs. FLPKX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ES Eversource Energy	4.54%	22.86%	-2.46%	-23.43%	-5.06%	8.18%	4.45%	34.49%	6.41%	17.97%
FLPKX Fidelity Low-Priced Stock Fund Class K	0.97%	14.75%	7.33%	14.50%	-5.63%	24.57%	9.42%	25.89%	-10.73%	18.89%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ES achieves a 4.54% return, which is significantly higher than FLPKX's 0.97% return. Over the past 10 years, ES has underperformed FLPKX with an annualized return of 5.28%, while FLPKX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.19% annualized return.

ES

• 1D: 0.53%
• 1M: -5.42%
• YTD: 4.54%
• 6M: -0.59%
• 1Y: 17.37%
• 3Y*: 0.61%
• 5Y*: -0.44%
• 10Y*: 5.28%

FLPKX

• 1D: 2.01%
• 1M: -6.02%
• YTD: 0.97%
• 6M: 2.44%
• 1Y: 17.04%
• 3Y*: 12.07%
• 5Y*: 7.79%
• 10Y*: 10.19%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

ES vs. FLPKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ES

ES Risk / Return Rank: 61
ES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
ES Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
ES Omega Ratio Rank: 57
ES Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
ES Martin Ratio Rank: 67

FLPKX

FLPKX Risk / Return Rank: 51
FLPKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
FLPKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
FLPKX Omega Ratio Rank: 52
FLPKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
FLPKX Martin Ratio Rank: 49

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ES vs. FLPKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eversource Energy (ES) and Fidelity Low-Priced Stock Fund Class K (FLPKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ES	FLPKX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.66	1.04	-0.38
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.97	1.54	-0.57
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.22	-0.07
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.15	1.24	-0.09
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.09	5.08	-1.99
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ES vs. FLPKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ES Sharpe Ratio is 0.66, which is lower than the FLPKX Sharpe Ratio of 1.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ES and FLPKX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ES	FLPKX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.66	1.04	-0.38
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.02	0.45	-0.47
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.22	0.59	-0.37
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.28	0.51	-0.23

Correlation

The correlation between ES and FLPKX is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

ES vs. FLPKX - Dividend Comparison

ES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.37%, less than FLPKX's 13.21% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ES Eversource Energy	4.37%	4.47%	4.98%	4.37%	3.04%	2.65%	2.62%	2.52%	3.11%	3.01%	3.22%	3.27%
FLPKX Fidelity Low-Priced Stock Fund Class K	13.21%	13.34%	16.33%	18.41%	9.55%	12.20%	11.24%	8.23%	13.58%	7.46%	4.95%	4.08%

Drawdowns

ES vs. FLPKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ES drawdown since its inception was -73.04%, which is greater than FLPKX's maximum drawdown of -51.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ES and FLPKX.

Drawdown Indicators

	ES	FLPKX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-73.04%	-51.34%	-21.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.13%	-12.52%	-2.61%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-41.69%	-18.71%	-22.98%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-41.69%	-38.15%	-3.54%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.14%	-6.96%	-6.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.09%	-6.53%	-12.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.61%	3.06%	+2.55%

Volatility

ES vs. FLPKX - Volatility Comparison

Eversource Energy (ES) has a higher volatility of 7.22% compared to Fidelity Low-Priced Stock Fund Class K (FLPKX) at 4.78%. This indicates that ES's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLPKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ES	FLPKX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.22%	4.78%	+2.44%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.73%	9.32%	+10.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.45%	16.89%	+9.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.77%	17.23%	+6.54%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.24%	17.35%	+6.89%