PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ES vs. XLU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ES vs. XLU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eversource Energy (ES) and State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ES achieves a 7.87% return, which is significantly higher than XLU's 6.99% return. Over the past 10 years, ES has underperformed XLU with an annualized return of 5.81%, while XLU has yielded a comparatively higher 9.35% annualized return.


ES

1D
1.30%
1M
1.47%
YTD
7.87%
6M
9.44%
1Y
17.22%
3Y*
5.34%
5Y*
1.80%
10Y*
5.81%

XLU

1D
0.78%
1M
0.02%
YTD
6.99%
6M
7.17%
1Y
14.05%
3Y*
14.90%
5Y*
10.60%
10Y*
9.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ES vs. XLU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ES
Eversource Energy
7.87%22.86%-2.46%-23.43%-5.06%8.18%4.45%34.49%6.41%17.97%
XLU
State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF
6.99%16.03%23.31%-7.18%1.44%17.70%0.51%25.93%3.94%12.05%

Correlation

The correlation between ES and XLU is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 1998

0.70

The correlation between ES and XLU shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (1 year) to 0.81 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ES vs. XLU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ES
ES Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
ES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ES Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
ES Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
ES Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
ES Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

XLU
XLU Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
XLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLU Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
XLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLU Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ES vs. XLU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eversource Energy (ES) and State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ESXLUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.17

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.14

1.54

-0.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.73

3.26

-0.53

ES vs. XLU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ES Sharpe Ratio is 0.70, which is comparable to the XLU Sharpe Ratio of 0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ES and XLU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ES vs. XLU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ES drawdown since its inception was -73.04%, which is greater than XLU's maximum drawdown of -51.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ES and XLU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ESXLUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.04%

-51.98%

-21.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.13%

-9.18%

-5.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.65%

-17.26%

-11.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.69%

-25.26%

-16.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.69%

-36.07%

-5.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.37%

-4.30%

-6.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.06%

-10.21%

-8.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.32%

4.32%

+2.00%

Volatility

ES vs. XLU - Volatility Comparison

Eversource Energy (ES) has a higher volatility of 7.03% compared to State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU) at 5.21%. This indicates that ES's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ESXLUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.03%

5.21%

+1.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.08%

11.70%

+4.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.61%

14.69%

+9.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.88%

17.30%

+6.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.37%

19.29%

+5.08%

Dividends

ES vs. XLU - Dividend Comparison

ES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.34%, more than XLU's 2.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ES
Eversource Energy
4.34%4.47%4.98%4.37%3.04%2.65%2.62%2.52%3.11%3.01%3.22%3.27%
XLU
State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF
2.65%2.71%2.96%3.39%2.92%2.79%3.14%2.95%3.33%3.33%3.41%3.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


ES and XLU have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ES has higher volatility (7.03%) compared to XLU (5.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ES dropped -73.04% vs XLU's -51.98%.

XLU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.96 vs 0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ES and XLU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer