BGC vs. NVDA

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

BGC (BGC Group Inc. ) and NVDA (NVIDIA Corporation) are both stocks. BGC operates in Capital Markets (Financial Services), while NVDA operates in Semiconductors (Technology). Over the past 10 years, BGC returned 7.36%/yr vs 64.62%/yr for NVDA. Their 0.30 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.

Performance

BGC vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BGC Group Inc. (BGC) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BGC achieves a 29.51% return, which is significantly higher than NVDA's 7.77% return. Over the past 10 years, BGC has underperformed NVDA with an annualized return of 7.36%, while NVDA has yielded a comparatively higher 64.62% annualized return.

BGC

• 1D: -1.37%
• 1M: 4.54%
• 6M: 26.95%
• YTD: 29.51%
• 1Y: 22.54%
• 3Y*: 36.29%
• 5Y*: 17.14%
• 10Y*: 7.36%
• ALL TIME*: -2.18%

NVDA

• 1D: 2.93%
• 1M: 3.04%
• 6M: 5.16%
• YTD: 7.77%
• 1Y: 15.71%
• 3Y*: 62.93%
• 5Y*: 59.52%
• 10Y*: 64.62%
• ALL TIME*: 36.28%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BGC BGC Group Inc.	$25.51M	$27.32M	$37.24M
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation	$25.46B	$26.13B	$31.85B

BGC vs. NVDA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BGC BGC Group Inc.	29.51%	-0.58%	26.46%	92.20%	-18.92%	16.25%	-32.66%	14.89%	-46.79%	47.70%
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation	7.77%	38.92%	171.25%	239.02%	-50.26%	125.48%	122.30%	76.94%	-30.82%	81.99%

Correlation

The correlation between BGC and NVDA is 0.15, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.15
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.20
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.32
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.28
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 1999	0.30

The correlation between BGC and NVDA shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (1 year) to 0.32 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap BGC : $5.47B NVDA : $4.86T
EPS BGC : $0.40 NVDA : $6.53
PE Ratio BGC : 28.65 NVDA : 30.73
PEG Ratio BGC : 0.75 NVDA : 0.17
PS Ratio BGC : 1.65 NVDA : 19.35
PB Ratio BGC : 4.99 NVDA : 25.05
Total Revenue (TTM) BGC : $3.35B NVDA : $253.49B
Gross Profit (TTM) BGC : $1.03B NVDA : $187.95B
EBITDA (TTM) BGC : $457.42M NVDA : $192.76B

Return for Risk

BGC vs. NVDA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BGC

BGC Risk / Return Rank: 68
BGC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
BGC Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
BGC Omega Ratio Rank: 64
BGC Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
BGC Martin Ratio Rank: 67

NVDA

NVDA Risk / Return Rank: 56
NVDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
NVDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
NVDA Omega Ratio Rank: 51
NVDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
NVDA Martin Ratio Rank: 59

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BGC vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BGC Group Inc. (BGC) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BGC	NVDA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.82	0.36	+0.46
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.31	0.76	+0.56
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.09	+0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.22	0.65	+0.58
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.40	1.32	+1.09

BGC vs. NVDA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BGC Sharpe Ratio is 0.82, which is higher than the NVDA Sharpe Ratio of 0.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BGC and NVDA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BGC vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BGC drawdown since its inception was -98.31%, which is greater than NVDA's maximum drawdown of -89.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGC and NVDA.

Drawdown Indicators

	BGC	NVDA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-98.31%	-89.72%	-8.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.77%	-20.21%	-0.56%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-34.46%	-36.88%	+2.42%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-46.99%	-66.34%	+19.35%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-79.67%	-66.34%	-13.33%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-77.86%	-14.74%	-63.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-86.85%	-36.07%	-50.78%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.56%	9.90%	+0.66%

Volatility

BGC vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BGC Group Inc. (BGC) is 8.01%, while NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) has a volatility of 12.04%. This indicates that BGC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BGC	NVDA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.01%	12.04%	-4.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	26.12%	28.30%	-2.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	31.37%	36.41%	-5.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	38.26%	51.87%	-13.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	40.42%	49.95%	-9.53%

Dividends

BGC vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison

BGC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.69%, more than NVDA's 0.14% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BGC BGC Group Inc.	0.69%	0.90%	0.77%	0.28%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation	0.14%	0.02%	0.03%	0.03%	0.11%	0.05%	0.12%	0.27%	0.46%	0.29%	0.45%	1.20%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BGC and NVDA in my portfolio?

BGC and NVDA have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BGC or NVDA?

NVDA has higher volatility (12.04%) compared to BGC (8.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BGC dropped -98.31% vs NVDA's -89.72%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BGC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.82 vs 0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.