BGC vs. NVDA

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

BGC (BGC Group Inc. ) and NVDA (NVIDIA Corporation) are both stocks. BGC operates in Capital Markets (Financial Services), while NVDA operates in Semiconductors (Technology). Over the past 10 years, BGC returned 1.63%/yr vs 69.46%/yr for NVDA. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

BGC vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BGC Group Inc. (BGC) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BGC achieves a 16.25% return, which is significantly lower than NVDA's 19.48% return. Over the past 10 years, BGC has underperformed NVDA with an annualized return of 1.63%, while NVDA has yielded a comparatively higher 69.46% annualized return.

BGC

• 1D: -1.05%
• 1M: -8.08%
• YTD: 16.25%
• 6M: 21.27%
• 1Y: 12.23%
• 3Y*: 36.00%
• 5Y*: 11.59%
• 10Y*: 1.63%

NVDA

• 1D: -0.69%
• 1M: 12.28%
• YTD: 19.48%
• 6M: 22.81%
• 1Y: 62.23%
• 3Y*: 78.33%
• 5Y*: 67.45%
• 10Y*: 69.46%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BGC vs. NVDA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BGC BGC Group Inc.	16.25%	-0.58%	26.46%	92.20%	-18.92%	16.25%	-32.66%	14.89%	-65.78%	47.70%
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation	19.48%	38.92%	171.25%	239.02%	-50.26%	125.48%	122.30%	76.94%	-30.82%	81.99%

Correlation

The correlation between BGC and NVDA is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.24
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.22
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.33
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.29
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 1999	0.30

The correlation between BGC and NVDA shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (3 years) to 0.33 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS BGC : $0.51 NVDA : $6.53
PE Ratio BGC : 20.30 NVDA : 34.15
PEG Ratio BGC : 0.53 NVDA : 0.19
PS Ratio BGC : 1.14 NVDA : 21.50
Total Revenue (TTM) BGC : $3.27B NVDA : $253.49B
Gross Profit (TTM) BGC : $1.36B NVDA : $187.95B
EBITDA (TTM) BGC : $315.57M NVDA : $192.76B

Return for Risk

BGC vs. NVDA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BGC

BGC Risk / Return Rank: 51
BGC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
BGC Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
BGC Omega Ratio Rank: 46
BGC Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
BGC Martin Ratio Rank: 51

NVDA

NVDA Risk / Return Rank: 82
NVDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
NVDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
NVDA Omega Ratio Rank: 79
NVDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
NVDA Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BGC vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BGC Group Inc. (BGC) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BGC	NVDA	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.44	1.84	-1.40
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.84	2.47	-1.63
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	1.30	-0.20
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.53	3.21	-2.68
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.02	7.92	-6.90
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BGC vs. NVDA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BGC Sharpe Ratio is 0.44, which is lower than the NVDA Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BGC and NVDA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BGC	NVDA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.44	1.84	-1.40
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.31	1.31	-1.01
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.04	1.40	-1.36
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.09	0.63	-0.72

Drawdowns

BGC vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BGC drawdown since its inception was -98.31%, which is greater than NVDA's maximum drawdown of -89.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGC and NVDA.

Drawdown Indicators

	BGC	NVDA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-98.31%	-89.72%	-8.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-23.25%	-20.21%	-3.04%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-34.46%	-36.88%	+2.42%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-51.80%	-66.34%	+14.54%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-86.93%	-66.34%	-20.59%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-87.22%	-5.48%	-81.74%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-88.08%	-36.21%	-51.87%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.12%	8.20%	+3.92%

Volatility

BGC vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BGC Group Inc. (BGC) is 7.73%, while NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) has a volatility of 11.79%. This indicates that BGC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BGC	NVDA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.73%	11.79%	-4.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.69%	25.29%	-3.60%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.24%	34.03%	-5.79%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	38.04%	51.66%	-13.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	41.98%	49.80%	-7.82%

Dividends

BGC vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison

BGC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%, more than NVDA's 0.02% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BGC BGC Group Inc.	0.77%	0.90%	0.77%	0.28%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation	0.02%	0.02%	0.03%	0.03%	0.11%	0.05%	0.12%	0.27%	0.46%	0.29%	0.45%	1.20%

Financials

BGC vs. NVDA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between BGC Group Inc. and NVIDIA Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

BGC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BGC Group Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 955.48M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

NVDA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a gross profit of 61.16B and revenue of 81.62B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.9%.

BGC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BGC Group Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 955.48M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

NVDA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported an operating income of 53.54B and revenue of 81.62B, resulting in an operating margin of 65.6%.

BGC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BGC Group Inc. reported a net income of 84.15M and revenue of 955.48M, resulting in a net margin of 8.8%.

NVDA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a net income of 58.32B and revenue of 81.62B, resulting in a net margin of 71.5%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BGC and NVDA in my portfolio?

BGC and NVDA have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BGC or NVDA?

NVDA has higher volatility (11.79%) compared to BGC (7.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BGC dropped -98.31% vs NVDA's -89.72%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NVDA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.