BCTK vs. TINY
BCTK (Baron Technology ETF) and TINY (ProShares Nanotechnology ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. BCTK is actively managed, while TINY is passively managed. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BCTK charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for TINY.
Performance
BCTK vs. TINY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BCTK achieves a 27.46% return, which is significantly lower than TINY's 59.78% return.
BCTK
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- 15.19%
- YTD
- 27.46%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TINY
- 1D
- 2.63%
- 1M
- 15.50%
- YTD
- 59.78%
- 6M
- 60.21%
- 1Y
- 114.15%
- 3Y*
- 31.25%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BCTK vs. TINY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BCTK Baron Technology ETF | 27.46% | 1.80% |
TINY ProShares Nanotechnology ETF | 59.78% | 0.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between BCTK and TINY is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2025 | 0.68 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BCTK vs. TINY — Risk / Return Rank
BCTK
TINY
BCTK vs. TINY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baron Technology ETF (BCTK) and ProShares Nanotechnology ETF (TINY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BCTK | TINY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 3.52 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.83 | 0.57 | +2.26 |
Drawdowns
BCTK vs. TINY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BCTK drawdown since its inception was -13.96%, smaller than the maximum TINY drawdown of -43.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCTK and TINY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BCTK | TINY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.96% | -43.79% | +29.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -16.75% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -42.13% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.76% | 0.00% | -0.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.00% | -16.16% | +13.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.75% | — |
Volatility
BCTK vs. TINY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BCTK | TINY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 12.04% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 26.40% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.98% | 32.66% | -5.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.98% | 32.37% | -5.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.98% | 32.37% | -5.39% |
BCTK vs. TINY - Expense Ratio Comparison
BCTK has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than TINY's 0.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
BCTK vs. TINY - Dividend Comparison
BCTK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TINY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCTK Baron Technology ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TINY ProShares Nanotechnology ETF | 0.18% | 0.29% | 0.01% | 0.35% | 0.42% | 0.07% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BCTK and TINY have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TINY is cheaper at 0.58% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TINY is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for BCTK.
TINY has the higher dividend yield at 0.18%, compared with 0.00% for BCTK.
They also come from different issuers: Baron Capital and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for BCTK and 0.58% for TINY.
Find the right allocation for BCTK and TINY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer