BCPL vs. BKEM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BCPL (BNY Mellon Core Plus ETF) and BKEM (BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BCPL is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by BNY Mellon, while BKEM is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Emerging Markets Large Cap Index. BCPL is actively managed, while BKEM is passively managed. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BCPL charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.11%/yr for BKEM.

Performance

BCPL vs. BKEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon Core Plus ETF (BCPL) and BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BKEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

BCPL

• 1D: -0.08%
• 1M: 0.38%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BKEM

• 1D: -1.31%
• 1M: 5.40%
• YTD: 28.54%
• 6M: 30.76%
• 1Y: 52.98%
• 3Y*: 23.65%
• 5Y*: 7.09%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BCPL vs. BKEM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
BCPL BNY Mellon Core Plus ETF	0.55%
BKEM BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF	21.51%

Correlation

The correlation between BCPL and BKEM is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2026	0.47

Return for Risk

BCPL vs. BKEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BKEM

BKEM Risk / Return Rank: 81
BKEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
BKEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
BKEM Omega Ratio Rank: 81
BKEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
BKEM Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BCPL vs. BKEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Core Plus ETF (BCPL) and BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BKEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BCPL	BKEM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.73	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.38	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.36	0.74	-0.39

Drawdowns

BCPL vs. BKEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCPL drawdown since its inception was -2.95%, smaller than the maximum BKEM drawdown of -39.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCPL and BKEM.

Drawdown Indicators

	BCPL	BKEM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.95%	-39.48%	+36.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-13.11%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-18.38%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-36.53%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.12%	-2.25%	+1.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.05%	-15.99%	+14.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.41%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BCPL	BKEM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	8.13%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	16.82%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.04%	19.52%	-15.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.04%	18.73%	-14.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.04%	19.12%	-15.08%

BCPL vs. BKEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

BCPL has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than BKEM's 0.11% expense ratio.

Dividends

BCPL vs. BKEM - Dividend Comparison

BCPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.57%, more than BKEM's 1.47% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
BCPL BNY Mellon Core Plus ETF	1.57%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
BKEM BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF	1.47%	2.25%	2.76%	3.02%	3.15%	2.22%	1.78%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BCPL and BKEM in my portfolio?

BCPL and BKEM have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BCPL or BKEM?

On fees, BKEM is cheaper at 0.11% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BCPL or BKEM?

BKEM is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for BCPL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BCPL or BKEM?

BCPL has the higher dividend yield at 1.57%, compared with 1.47% for BKEM.

What is the main difference between BCPL and BKEM?

BCPL is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while BKEM is Asia Pacific Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for BCPL and 0.11% for BKEM.