BCPL vs. BKMC

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BCPL (BNY Mellon Core Plus ETF) and BKMC (BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BCPL is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by BNY Mellon, while BKMC is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Mid Cap Index. BCPL is actively managed, while BKMC is passively managed. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BCPL charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for BKMC.

Performance

BCPL vs. BKMC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon Core Plus ETF (BCPL) and BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF (BKMC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

BCPL

• 1D: -0.08%
• 1M: 0.38%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BKMC

• 1D: -0.34%
• 1M: 3.45%
• YTD: 11.31%
• 6M: 11.40%
• 1Y: 23.02%
• 3Y*: 16.09%
• 5Y*: 7.85%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BCPL vs. BKMC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
BCPL BNY Mellon Core Plus ETF	0.55%
BKMC BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF	5.27%

Correlation

The correlation between BCPL and BKMC is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2026	0.49

Return for Risk

BCPL vs. BKMC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BKMC

BKMC Risk / Return Rank: 46
BKMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
BKMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
BKMC Omega Ratio Rank: 41
BKMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
BKMC Martin Ratio Rank: 53

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BCPL vs. BKMC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Core Plus ETF (BCPL) and BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF (BKMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BCPL	BKMC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.53	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.42	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.36	0.82	-0.47

Drawdowns

BCPL vs. BKMC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCPL drawdown since its inception was -2.95%, smaller than the maximum BKMC drawdown of -25.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCPL and BKMC.

Drawdown Indicators

	BCPL	BKMC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.95%	-25.02%	+22.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-9.82%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-23.68%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-25.02%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.12%	-0.34%	-0.78%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.05%	-6.55%	+5.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.55%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BCPL	BKMC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.16%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	10.93%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.04%	15.12%	-11.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.04%	18.77%	-14.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.04%	19.16%	-15.12%

BCPL vs. BKMC - Expense Ratio Comparison

BCPL has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than BKMC's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

BCPL vs. BKMC - Dividend Comparison

BCPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.57%, more than BKMC's 1.38% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
BCPL BNY Mellon Core Plus ETF	1.57%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
BKMC BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF	1.38%	1.35%	1.54%	1.38%	1.63%	1.15%	0.86%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BCPL and BKMC in my portfolio?

BCPL and BKMC have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BCPL or BKMC?

On fees, BKMC is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BCPL or BKMC?

BKMC is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for BCPL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BCPL or BKMC?

BCPL has the higher dividend yield at 1.57%, compared with 1.38% for BKMC.

What is the main difference between BCPL and BKMC?

BCPL is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while BKMC is Mid Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for BCPL and 0.04% for BKMC.