BCPL vs. BKMC
BCPL (BNY Mellon Core Plus ETF) and BKMC (BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BCPL is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by BNY Mellon, while BKMC is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Mid Cap Index. BCPL is actively managed, while BKMC is passively managed. Their 0.52 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. BCPL charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for BKMC.
Performance
BCPL vs. BKMC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BCPL
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- -1.41%
- 6M
- -0.59%
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
BKMC
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- -1.34%
- 6M
- 6.36%
- YTD
- 11.65%
- 1Y
- 19.28%
- 3Y*
- 13.19%
- 5Y*
- 7.66%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 15.39%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $653.50K | $1.05M | $1.39M | |
| $1.12M | $1.07M | $1.01M |
BCPL vs. BKMC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BCPL BNY Mellon Core Plus ETF | -0.63% |
BKMC BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF | 5.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between BCPL and BKMC is 0.52, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2026 | 0.52 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BCPL vs. BKMC — Risk / Return Rank
BCPL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BKMC
BCPL vs. BKMC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Core Plus ETF (BCPL) and BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF (BKMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BCPL | BKMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.21 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.80 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 6.81 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BCPL vs. BKMC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BCPL drawdown since its inception was -2.95%, smaller than the maximum BKMC drawdown of -25.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCPL and BKMC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BCPL | BKMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.95% | -25.02% | +22.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.82% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.02% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.16% | -2.30% | +0.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.09% | -6.42% | +5.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.59% | — |
Volatility
BCPL vs. BKMC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BCPL | BKMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.36% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.16% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.94% | 15.38% | -11.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.94% | 18.80% | -14.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.94% | 19.04% | -15.10% |
BCPL vs. BKMC - Expense Ratio Comparison
BCPL has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than BKMC's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
BCPL vs. BKMC - Dividend Comparison
BCPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.95%, more than BKMC's 1.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCPL BNY Mellon Core Plus ETF | 1.95% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BKMC BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF | 1.42% | 1.35% | 1.54% | 1.38% | 1.63% | 1.15% | 0.86% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BCPL and BKMC have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BKMC is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BKMC is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for BCPL.
BCPL has the higher dividend yield at 1.95%, compared with 1.42% for BKMC.
BCPL is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while BKMC is Mid Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for BCPL and 0.04% for BKMC.
Find the right allocation for BCPL and BKMC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer