BCPL vs. BKCI
BCPL (BNY Mellon Core Plus ETF) and BKCI (BNY Mellon Concentrated International ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BCPL is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by BNY Mellon, while BKCI is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by BNY Mellon. Both are actively managed. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BCPL charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for BKCI.
Performance
BCPL vs. BKCI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BCPL
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.22%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BKCI
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 2.74%
- YTD
- 3.86%
- 6M
- 5.57%
- 1Y
- 6.49%
- 3Y*
- 4.67%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BCPL vs. BKCI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BCPL BNY Mellon Core Plus ETF | 0.63% |
BKCI BNY Mellon Concentrated International ETF | -0.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between BCPL and BKCI is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2026 | 0.60 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BCPL vs. BKCI — Risk / Return Rank
BCPL
BKCI
BCPL vs. BKCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Core Plus ETF (BCPL) and BNY Mellon Concentrated International ETF (BKCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BCPL | BKCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.46 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | 0.10 | +0.32 |
Drawdowns
BCPL vs. BKCI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BCPL drawdown since its inception was -2.95%, smaller than the maximum BKCI drawdown of -31.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCPL and BKCI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BCPL | BKCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.95% | -31.03% | +28.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -20.02% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.04% | -0.74% | -0.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.05% | -9.41% | +8.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.60% | — |
Volatility
BCPL vs. BKCI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BCPL | BKCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.96% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.24% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.06% | 14.31% | -10.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.06% | 16.62% | -12.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.06% | 16.62% | -12.56% |
BCPL vs. BKCI - Expense Ratio Comparison
BCPL has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than BKCI's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
BCPL vs. BKCI - Dividend Comparison
BCPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.56%, more than BKCI's 1.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCPL BNY Mellon Core Plus ETF | 1.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BKCI BNY Mellon Concentrated International ETF | 1.34% | 1.39% | 0.78% | 0.73% | 0.46% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BCPL and BKCI have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BCPL is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BCPL is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for BKCI.
BCPL has the higher dividend yield at 1.56%, compared with 1.34% for BKCI.
BCPL is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while BKCI is Foreign Large Cap Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for BCPL and 0.80% for BKCI.
Find the right allocation for BCPL and BKCI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer