BCPL vs. BKGI
BCPL (BNY Mellon Core Plus ETF) and BKGI (Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BCPL is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by BNY Mellon, while BKGI is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by BNY Mellon. Both are actively managed. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BCPL charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for BKGI.
Performance
BCPL vs. BKGI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BCPL
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.22%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BKGI
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- -0.23%
- YTD
- 12.69%
- 6M
- 12.56%
- 1Y
- 21.83%
- 3Y*
- 22.31%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BCPL vs. BKGI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BCPL BNY Mellon Core Plus ETF | 0.63% |
BKGI Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF | 11.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between BCPL and BKGI is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2026 | 0.37 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BCPL vs. BKGI — Risk / Return Rank
BCPL
BKGI
BCPL vs. BKGI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Core Plus ETF (BCPL) and Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF (BKGI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BCPL | BKGI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.89 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | 1.62 | -1.21 |
Drawdowns
BCPL vs. BKGI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BCPL drawdown since its inception was -2.95%, smaller than the maximum BKGI drawdown of -14.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCPL and BKGI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BCPL | BKGI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.95% | -14.79% | +11.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.16% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.16% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.04% | -2.72% | +1.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.05% | -2.56% | +1.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.87% | — |
Volatility
BCPL vs. BKGI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BCPL | BKGI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.23% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.08% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.06% | 11.63% | -7.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.06% | 14.08% | -10.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.06% | 14.08% | -10.02% |
BCPL vs. BKGI - Expense Ratio Comparison
BCPL has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than BKGI's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
BCPL vs. BKGI - Dividend Comparison
BCPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.56%, less than BKGI's 2.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCPL BNY Mellon Core Plus ETF | 1.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BKGI Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF | 2.68% | 2.65% | 4.55% | 4.55% | 0.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BCPL and BKGI have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BCPL is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BCPL is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for BKGI.
BKGI has the higher dividend yield at 2.68%, compared with 1.56% for BCPL.
BCPL is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while BKGI is Energy Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for BCPL and 0.65% for BKGI.
Find the right allocation for BCPL and BKGI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer