BCD vs. GLTR
Compare and contrast key facts about abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCD) and Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR).
BCD and GLTR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BCD is an actively managed fund by Aberdeen. It was launched on Mar 30, 2017. GLTR is a passively managed fund by Aberdeen that tracks the performance of the ETFS Physical Precious Metals Basket Index. It was launched on Oct 22, 2010.
Performance
BCD vs. GLTR - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BCD vs. GLTR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCD abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF | 15.57% | 15.71% | 6.20% | -7.58% | 18.38% | 31.87% | 4.76% | 7.34% | -8.65% | 3.08% |
GLTR Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF | 6.38% | 87.25% | 20.63% | 2.01% | -0.25% | -9.60% | 29.52% | 20.96% | -2.85% | 2.22% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BCD achieves a 15.57% return, which is significantly higher than GLTR's 6.38% return.
BCD
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- 4.50%
- YTD
- 15.57%
- 6M
- 21.94%
- 1Y
- 22.76%
- 3Y*
- 11.07%
- 5Y*
- 13.81%
- 10Y*
- —
GLTR
- 1D
- 4.98%
- 1M
- -14.74%
- YTD
- 6.38%
- 6M
- 32.20%
- 1Y
- 68.93%
- 3Y*
- 33.85%
- 5Y*
- 18.37%
- 10Y*
- 14.10%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BCD vs. GLTR - Expense Ratio Comparison
BCD has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than GLTR's 0.60% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BCD vs. GLTR — Risk / Return Rank
BCD
GLTR
BCD vs. GLTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCD) and Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BCD | GLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.51 | 1.87 | -0.36 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.02 | 2.11 | -0.09 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.36 | -0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.42 | 2.38 | +0.03 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.58 | 8.28 | -0.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BCD | GLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.51 | 1.87 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 | 0.80 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.70 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 0.34 | +0.30 |
Correlation
The correlation between BCD and GLTR is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
BCD vs. GLTR - Dividend Comparison
BCD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.89%, while GLTR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCD abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF | 14.89% | 17.21% | 3.60% | 4.51% | 5.21% | 8.30% | 1.29% | 1.55% | 1.59% | 0.07% |
GLTR Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
BCD vs. GLTR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BCD drawdown since its inception was -29.81%, smaller than the maximum GLTR drawdown of -55.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCD and GLTR.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BCD | GLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.81% | -55.70% | +25.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.75% | -29.70% | +19.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.03% | -29.70% | +6.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -29.70% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.53% | -23.32% | +20.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.01% | -28.89% | +18.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.11% | 8.54% | -5.43% |
Volatility
BCD vs. GLTR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCD) is 5.53%, while Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR) has a volatility of 13.48%. This indicates that BCD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BCD | GLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.53% | 13.48% | -7.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.60% | 35.75% | -24.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.15% | 37.11% | -21.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.42% | 23.16% | -7.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.93% | 20.28% | -6.35% |