PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBIN vs. ICOW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BBIN vs. ICOW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan BetaBuilders International Equity ETF (BBIN) and Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF (ICOW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBIN achieves a 9.46% return, which is significantly lower than ICOW's 17.35% return.


BBIN

1D
0.76%
1M
2.67%
YTD
9.46%
6M
11.52%
1Y
21.87%
3Y*
17.25%
5Y*
8.67%
10Y*

ICOW

1D
0.00%
1M
1.48%
YTD
17.35%
6M
18.03%
1Y
38.86%
3Y*
20.34%
5Y*
10.06%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBIN vs. ICOW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
BBIN
JPMorgan BetaBuilders International Equity ETF
9.46%31.86%3.65%18.54%-14.29%11.74%7.91%3.14%
ICOW
Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF
17.35%36.95%-2.59%18.94%-7.98%11.52%7.20%4.76%

Correlation

The correlation between BBIN and ICOW is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2019

0.89

The correlation between BBIN and ICOW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

BBIN vs. ICOW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BBIN
ICOW

Financial Services

24.8%

-

Industrials

16.6%
28.7%

Technology

12.5%
6.2%

Healthcare

9.0%
7.1%

Consumer Defensive

5.9%
8.5%

Consumer Cyclical

5.4%
11.6%

Basic Materials

5.0%
5.4%

Communication Services

3.2%
8.9%

Energy

3.0%
23.7%

Utilities

1.7%

-

Real Estate

0.3%

-

Financial Services

BBIN
24.8%
ICOW

-

Industrials

BBIN
16.6%
ICOW
28.7%

Technology

BBIN
12.5%
ICOW
6.2%

Healthcare

BBIN
9.0%
ICOW
7.1%

Consumer Defensive

BBIN
5.9%
ICOW
8.5%

Consumer Cyclical

BBIN
5.4%
ICOW
11.6%

Basic Materials

BBIN
5.0%
ICOW
5.4%

Communication Services

BBIN
3.2%
ICOW
8.9%

Energy

BBIN
3.0%
ICOW
23.7%

Utilities

BBIN
1.7%
ICOW

-

Real Estate

BBIN
0.3%
ICOW

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBIN vs. ICOW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBIN
BBIN Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
BBIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBIN Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
BBIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBIN Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

ICOW
ICOW Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
ICOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ICOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
ICOW Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
ICOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
ICOW Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBIN vs. ICOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders International Equity ETF (BBIN) and Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF (ICOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BBINICOWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.50

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.90

4.87

-2.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.05

17.40

-10.35

BBIN vs. ICOW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBIN Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is lower than the ICOW Sharpe Ratio of 2.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBIN and ICOW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BBINICOWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.41

2.85

-1.43

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

0.61

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.55

-0.01

Drawdowns

BBIN vs. ICOW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBIN drawdown since its inception was -33.37%, smaller than the maximum ICOW drawdown of -43.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBIN and ICOW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBINICOWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.37%

-43.49%

+10.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.57%

-8.02%

-3.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.98%

-14.81%

+0.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.24%

-28.48%

-0.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.04%

-0.63%

-0.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.30%

-7.58%

+1.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.11%

2.24%

+0.87%

Volatility

BBIN vs. ICOW - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan BetaBuilders International Equity ETF (BBIN) has a higher volatility of 5.04% compared to Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF (ICOW) at 3.99%. This indicates that BBIN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ICOW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBINICOWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.04%

3.99%

+1.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.79%

10.58%

+2.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.56%

13.72%

+1.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.57%

16.64%

-0.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.12%

18.46%

+0.66%

BBIN vs. ICOW - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBIN has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than ICOW's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

BBIN vs. ICOW - Dividend Comparison

BBIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.61%, more than ICOW's 2.71% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
BBIN
JPMorgan BetaBuilders International Equity ETF
3.61%3.87%3.41%3.20%2.83%3.54%1.07%0.09%0.00%0.00%
ICOW
Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF
2.71%3.03%4.39%3.61%5.26%2.11%2.46%3.10%2.61%0.80%

Frequently Asked Questions


BBIN and ICOW have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BBIN has higher volatility (5.04%) compared to ICOW (3.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBIN dropped -33.37% vs ICOW's -43.49%.

On 5-year performance, ICOW leads with 10.06% vs 8.67% for BBIN. On fees, BBIN is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, ICOW has been the lower-risk option at 3.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, ICOW has performed better with a 10.06% return vs 8.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBIN is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ICOW.

BBIN has the higher dividend yield at 3.61%, compared with 2.71% for ICOW.

BBIN tracks Morningstar Developed Markets ex-North America Target Market Exposure Index, while ICOW tracks Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for BBIN and 0.65% for ICOW.

ICOW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.85 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBIN and ICOW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer