PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBIN vs. DBAW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BBIN vs. DBAW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan BetaBuilders International Equity ETF (BBIN) and Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF (DBAW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBIN achieves a 8.64% return, which is significantly lower than DBAW's 16.12% return.


BBIN

1D
-0.65%
1M
3.28%
YTD
8.64%
6M
10.96%
1Y
21.60%
3Y*
16.72%
5Y*
8.51%
10Y*

DBAW

1D
-0.51%
1M
6.28%
YTD
16.12%
6M
18.39%
1Y
36.60%
3Y*
21.15%
5Y*
11.32%
10Y*
11.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBIN vs. DBAW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
BBIN
JPMorgan BetaBuilders International Equity ETF
8.64%31.86%3.65%18.54%-14.29%11.74%7.91%3.14%
DBAW
Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF
16.12%26.47%14.35%16.26%-13.35%13.08%7.44%2.61%

Correlation

The correlation between BBIN and DBAW is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2019

0.89

The correlation between BBIN and DBAW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

BBIN vs. DBAW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BBIN
DBAW

Financial Services

24.8%
24.1%

Industrials

16.6%
15.0%

Technology

12.5%
18.7%

Healthcare

9.0%
7.2%

Consumer Defensive

5.9%
5.3%

Consumer Cyclical

5.4%
7.9%

Basic Materials

5.0%
6.8%

Communication Services

3.2%
5.0%

Energy

3.0%
5.3%

Utilities

1.7%
3.2%

Real Estate

0.3%
1.5%

Financial Services

BBIN
24.8%
DBAW
24.1%

Industrials

BBIN
16.6%
DBAW
15.0%

Technology

BBIN
12.5%
DBAW
18.7%

Healthcare

BBIN
9.0%
DBAW
7.2%

Consumer Defensive

BBIN
5.9%
DBAW
5.3%

Consumer Cyclical

BBIN
5.4%
DBAW
7.9%

Basic Materials

BBIN
5.0%
DBAW
6.8%

Communication Services

BBIN
3.2%
DBAW
5.0%

Energy

BBIN
3.0%
DBAW
5.3%

Utilities

BBIN
1.7%
DBAW
3.2%

Real Estate

BBIN
0.3%
DBAW
1.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBIN vs. DBAW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBIN
BBIN Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
BBIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBIN Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
BBIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBIN Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

DBAW
DBAW Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
DBAW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBAW Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBAW Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
DBAW Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBAW Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBIN vs. DBAW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders International Equity ETF (BBIN) and Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF (DBAW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BBINDBAWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.55

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.87

4.09

-2.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.96

16.97

-10.00

BBIN vs. DBAW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBIN Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is lower than the DBAW Sharpe Ratio of 2.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBIN and DBAW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BBINDBAWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.40

2.86

-1.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.83

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.63

-0.09

Drawdowns

BBIN vs. DBAW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBIN drawdown since its inception was -33.37%, which is greater than DBAW's maximum drawdown of -31.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBIN and DBAW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBINDBAWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.37%

-31.44%

-1.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.57%

-9.00%

-2.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.98%

-14.11%

+0.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.24%

-17.87%

-11.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.78%

-0.51%

-1.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.30%

-5.00%

-1.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.11%

2.16%

+0.95%

Volatility

BBIN vs. DBAW - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan BetaBuilders International Equity ETF (BBIN) has a higher volatility of 5.15% compared to Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF (DBAW) at 4.71%. This indicates that BBIN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBAW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBINDBAWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.15%

4.71%

+0.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.78%

11.00%

+1.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.57%

12.88%

+2.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.57%

13.74%

+2.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.12%

15.28%

+3.84%

BBIN vs. DBAW - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBIN has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than DBAW's 0.41% expense ratio.


Dividends

BBIN vs. DBAW - Dividend Comparison

BBIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.63%, more than DBAW's 3.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBIN
JPMorgan BetaBuilders International Equity ETF
3.63%3.87%3.41%3.20%2.83%3.54%1.07%0.09%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DBAW
Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF
3.29%3.83%1.70%3.45%8.81%2.05%2.08%2.91%2.93%2.41%1.99%5.74%

Frequently Asked Questions


BBIN and DBAW have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BBIN has higher volatility (5.15%) compared to DBAW (4.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBIN dropped -33.37% vs DBAW's -31.44%.

On 5-year performance, DBAW leads with 11.32% vs 8.51% for BBIN. On fees, BBIN is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, DBAW has been the lower-risk option at 4.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DBAW has performed better with a 11.32% return vs 8.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBIN is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.41% for DBAW.

BBIN has the higher dividend yield at 3.63%, compared with 3.29% for DBAW.

BBIN tracks Morningstar Developed Markets ex-North America Target Market Exposure Index, while DBAW tracks MSCI ACWI ex USA US Dollar Hedged Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for BBIN and 0.41% for DBAW.

DBAW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.86 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBIN and DBAW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer