BBHL vs. VUG
BBHL (BBH Select Large Cap ETF) and VUG (Vanguard Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - BBHL tracks the Actively Managed while VUG tracks the CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BBHL charges 0.71%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VUG.
Performance
BBHL vs. VUG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BBHL achieves a 6.39% return, which is significantly lower than VUG's 9.78% return.
BBHL
- 1D
- 0.94%
- 1M
- 4.01%
- YTD
- 6.39%
- 6M
- 6.61%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VUG
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- 5.75%
- YTD
- 9.78%
- 6M
- 8.99%
- 1Y
- 27.72%
- 3Y*
- 26.10%
- 5Y*
- 15.17%
- 10Y*
- 18.25%
BBHL vs. VUG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BBHL BBH Select Large Cap ETF | 6.39% | 2.72% |
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF | 9.78% | 1.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between BBHL and VUG is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025 | 0.84 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BBHL vs. VUG — Risk / Return Rank
BBHL
VUG
BBHL vs. VUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BBH Select Large Cap ETF (BBHL) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BBHL | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.76 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.69 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.85 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.41 | 0.62 | +0.79 |
Drawdowns
BBHL vs. VUG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BBHL drawdown since its inception was -11.99%, smaller than the maximum VUG drawdown of -50.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBHL and VUG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BBHL | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.99% | -50.68% | +38.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -16.53% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.85% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.61% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.25% | +1.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.98% | -7.09% | +4.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.71% | — |
Volatility
BBHL vs. VUG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BBHL | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.81% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.11% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.71% | 15.83% | -3.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.71% | 22.21% | -9.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.71% | 21.44% | -8.73% |
BBHL vs. VUG - Expense Ratio Comparison
BBHL has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than VUG's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
BBHL vs. VUG - Dividend Comparison
BBHL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VUG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBHL BBH Select Large Cap ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF | 0.37% | 0.41% | 0.47% | 0.58% | 0.70% | 0.48% | 0.66% | 0.95% | 1.32% | 1.14% | 1.39% | 1.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BBHL and VUG have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VUG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VUG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.71% for BBHL.
VUG has the higher dividend yield at 0.37%, compared with 0.00% for BBHL.
BBHL tracks Actively Managed, while VUG tracks CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: BBH and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.71% for BBHL and 0.03% for VUG.
Find the right allocation for BBHL and VUG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer