BBHL vs. EUSA
BBHL (BBH Select Large Cap ETF) and EUSA (iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BBHL is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Actively Managed, while EUSA is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Equal Weighted Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BBHL charges 0.71%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for EUSA.
Performance
BBHL vs. EUSA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BBHL achieves a 7.82% return, which is significantly lower than EUSA's 11.75% return.
BBHL
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- 2.24%
- 6M
- 4.58%
- YTD
- 7.82%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EUSA
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 1.60%
- 6M
- 8.38%
- YTD
- 11.75%
- 1Y
- 16.46%
- 3Y*
- 14.60%
- 5Y*
- 7.83%
- 10Y*
- 11.50%
BBHL vs. EUSA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BBHL BBH Select Large Cap ETF | 7.82% | 1.70% |
EUSA iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF | 11.75% | 2.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between BBHL and EUSA is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025 | 0.80 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BBHL vs. EUSA — Risk / Return Rank
BBHL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
EUSA
BBHL vs. EUSA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BBH Select Large Cap ETF (BBHL) and iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF (EUSA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BBHL | EUSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.23 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.00 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 7.87 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BBHL vs. EUSA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BBHL drawdown since its inception was -11.99%, smaller than the maximum EUSA drawdown of -39.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBHL and EUSA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BBHL | EUSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.99% | -39.16% | +27.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.82% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.20% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.24% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.16% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.40% | -0.55% | +0.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.72% | -4.57% | +1.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.99% | — |
Volatility
BBHL vs. EUSA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BBHL | EUSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.35% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.96% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.03% | 12.02% | +1.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.03% | 16.97% | -3.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.03% | 18.27% | -5.24% |
BBHL vs. EUSA - Expense Ratio Comparison
BBHL has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than EUSA's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
BBHL vs. EUSA - Dividend Comparison
BBHL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EUSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBHL BBH Select Large Cap ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EUSA iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF | 1.45% | 1.63% | 1.47% | 1.53% | 1.73% | 1.23% | 1.45% | 1.49% | 2.01% | 1.50% | 1.59% | 2.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BBHL and EUSA have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EUSA is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EUSA is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.71% for BBHL.
EUSA has the higher dividend yield at 1.45%, compared with 0.00% for BBHL.
BBHL is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while EUSA is Mid Cap Blend Equities. BBHL tracks Actively Managed, while EUSA tracks MSCI USA Equal Weighted Index. They also come from different issuers: BBH and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.71% for BBHL and 0.09% for EUSA.
Find the right allocation for BBHL and EUSA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer