PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BAP vs. ECHO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BAP vs. ECHO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Credicorp Ltd. (BAP) and EchoStar Corporation (ECHO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


BAP

1D
1.26%
1M
13.70%
YTD
42.16%
6M
40.69%
1Y
82.53%
3Y*
46.33%
5Y*
33.19%
10Y*
14.62%

ECHO

1D
0.65%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BAP vs. ECHO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)
BAP
Credicorp Ltd.
2.37%
ECHO
EchoStar Corporation
-1.85%

Correlation

The correlation between BAP and ECHO is -0.54, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2026

-0.54

Fundamentals

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BAP vs. ECHO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAP
BAP Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
BAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
BAP Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
BAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
BAP Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

ECHO

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BAP vs. ECHO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Credicorp Ltd. (BAP) and EchoStar Corporation (ECHO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BAPECHODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.66

BAP vs. ECHO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BAP vs. ECHO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAP drawdown since its inception was -75.92%, which is greater than ECHO's maximum drawdown of -6.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAP and ECHO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BAPECHODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.92%

-6.48%

-69.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.33%

+2.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.90%

-3.67%

-20.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.10%

Volatility

BAP vs. ECHO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BAPECHODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.37%

42.51%

-9.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.71%

42.51%

-10.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.24%

42.51%

-11.27%

Dividends

BAP vs. ECHO - Dividend Comparison

BAP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.66%, while ECHO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BAP
Credicorp Ltd.
3.66%3.78%6.65%4.52%2.84%0.99%5.37%3.95%1.94%4.16%1.47%2.25%
ECHO
EchoStar Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

BAP vs. ECHO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Credicorp Ltd. and EchoStar Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


4.00B5.00B6.00B7.00B8.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
7.74B
(BAP) Total Revenue
(ECHO) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. BAP values in PEN, ECHO values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


BAP and ECHO have a correlation of -0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BAP and ECHO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer