BAP vs. ATEYY
BAP (Credicorp Ltd.) and ATEYY (Advantest Corp DRC) are both stocks. BAP operates in Banks - Regional (Financial Services), while ATEYY operates in Semiconductor Equipment & Materials (Technology). Over the past 10 years, BAP returned 12.23%/yr vs 51.21%/yr for ATEYY. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BAP vs. ATEYY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BAP achieves a 11.98% return, which is significantly lower than ATEYY's 31.02% return. Over the past 10 years, BAP has underperformed ATEYY with an annualized return of 12.23%, while ATEYY has yielded a comparatively higher 51.21% annualized return.
BAP
- 1D
- -0.81%
- 1M
- -2.76%
- YTD
- 11.98%
- 6M
- 19.32%
- 1Y
- 47.72%
- 3Y*
- 37.39%
- 5Y*
- 26.07%
- 10Y*
- 12.23%
ATEYY
- 1D
- 7.82%
- 1M
- -16.54%
- YTD
- 31.02%
- 6M
- 27.11%
- 1Y
- 199.81%
- 3Y*
- 73.30%
- 5Y*
- 49.34%
- 10Y*
- 51.21%
BAP vs. ATEYY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAP Credicorp Ltd. | 11.98% | 65.23% | 31.35% | 16.29% | 14.47% | -24.73% | -17.56% | -0.26% | 7.07% | 37.84% |
ATEYY Advantest Corp DRC | 31.02% | 122.70% | 68.99% | 111.43% | -33.43% | 27.37% | 30.96% | 176.84% | 12.51% | 12.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between BAP and ATEYY is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016 | 0.24 |
Fundamentals
BAP:
$25.42B
ATEYY:
$120.75B
BAP:
$90.36
ATEYY:
$520.21
BAP:
3.54
ATEYY:
0.32
BAP:
0.19
ATEYY:
0.00
BAP:
0.89
ATEYY:
0.11
BAP:
0.66
ATEYY:
0.15
BAP:
$28.76B
ATEYY:
$1.14T
BAP:
$22.06B
ATEYY:
$736.09B
BAP:
$11.19B
ATEYY:
$533.69B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BAP vs. ATEYY — Risk / Return Rank
BAP
ATEYY
BAP vs. ATEYY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Credicorp Ltd. (BAP) and Advantest Corp DRC (ATEYY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BAP | ATEYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.39 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.57 | 6.05 | -3.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.50 | 16.62 | -10.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BAP | ATEYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.53 | 2.96 | -1.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 | 0.94 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 | 1.07 | -0.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 1.13 | -0.69 |
Drawdowns
BAP vs. ATEYY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BAP drawdown since its inception was -75.92%, which is greater than ATEYY's maximum drawdown of -56.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAP and ATEYY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BAP | ATEYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.92% | -56.48% | -19.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.65% | -33.24% | +14.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.53% | -44.70% | +18.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.40% | -56.48% | +23.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.09% | -56.48% | -2.61% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.36% | -16.54% | +2.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.96% | -14.23% | -9.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.36% | 12.08% | -4.72% |
Volatility
BAP vs. ATEYY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Credicorp Ltd. (BAP) is 13.46%, while Advantest Corp DRC (ATEYY) has a volatility of 21.85%. This indicates that BAP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ATEYY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BAP | ATEYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.46% | 21.85% | -8.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.65% | 51.89% | -24.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.35% | 68.01% | -36.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.49% | 52.61% | -21.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.10% | 48.23% | -17.13% |
Dividends
BAP vs. ATEYY - Dividend Comparison
BAP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, while ATEYY has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATEYY Advantest Corp DRC | 0.00% | 0.11% | 0.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.18% | 1.24% | 0.00% |
BAP Credicorp Ltd. | 0.46% | 3.78% | 6.65% | 4.52% | 2.84% | 0.99% | 5.37% | 3.95% | 0.20% | 4.16% | 1.47% | 2.25% |
Financials
BAP vs. ATEYY - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Credicorp Ltd. and Advantest Corp DRC. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BAP vs. ATEYY - Profitability Comparison
BAP - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Credicorp Ltd. reported a gross profit of 6.01B and revenue of 7.74B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 77.7%.
ATEYY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Advantest Corp DRC reported a gross profit of 225.18B and revenue of 334.10B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.4%.
BAP - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Credicorp Ltd. reported an operating income of 2.91B and revenue of 7.74B, resulting in an operating margin of 37.7%.
ATEYY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Advantest Corp DRC reported an operating income of 156.38B and revenue of 334.10B, resulting in an operating margin of 46.8%.
BAP - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Credicorp Ltd. reported a net income of 2.06B and revenue of 7.74B, resulting in a net margin of 26.6%.
ATEYY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Advantest Corp DRC reported a net income of 129.16B and revenue of 334.10B, resulting in a net margin of 38.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BAP and ATEYY have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ATEYY has higher volatility (21.85%) compared to BAP (13.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BAP dropped -75.92% vs ATEYY's -56.48%.
ATEYY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.96 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BAP and ATEYY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer