PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BAMD vs. SPYV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BAMD vs. SPYV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brookstone Dividend Stock ETF (BAMD) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BAMD achieves a 8.13% return, which is significantly higher than SPYV's 7.46% return.


BAMD

1D
-0.67%
1M
0.36%
YTD
8.13%
6M
8.26%
1Y
7.69%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SPYV

1D
-0.36%
1M
2.22%
YTD
7.46%
6M
7.77%
1Y
21.26%
3Y*
15.72%
5Y*
10.68%
10Y*
11.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BAMD vs. SPYV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
BAMD
Brookstone Dividend Stock ETF
8.13%-1.33%19.76%10.73%
SPYV
SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF
7.46%13.18%12.24%13.25%

Correlation

The correlation between BAMD and SPYV is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2023

0.79

The correlation between BAMD and SPYV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

BAMD vs. SPYV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BAMD
SPYV

Financial Services

26.8%
14.7%

Energy

15.6%
7.4%

Technology

13.0%
21.2%

Consumer Defensive

12.8%
9.2%

Utilities

12.6%
4.4%

Industrials

4.7%
10.6%

Healthcare

4.2%
11.6%

Communication Services

4.0%
3.2%

Consumer Cyclical

3.2%
10.9%

Basic Materials

2.6%
3.4%

Real Estate

0.6%
3.3%

Financial Services

BAMD
26.8%
SPYV
14.7%

Energy

BAMD
15.6%
SPYV
7.4%

Technology

BAMD
13.0%
SPYV
21.2%

Consumer Defensive

BAMD
12.8%
SPYV
9.2%

Utilities

BAMD
12.6%
SPYV
4.4%

Industrials

BAMD
4.7%
SPYV
10.6%

Healthcare

BAMD
4.2%
SPYV
11.6%

Communication Services

BAMD
4.0%
SPYV
3.2%

Consumer Cyclical

BAMD
3.2%
SPYV
10.9%

Basic Materials

BAMD
2.6%
SPYV
3.4%

Real Estate

BAMD
0.6%
SPYV
3.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BAMD vs. SPYV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAMD
BAMD Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
BAMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BAMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
BAMD Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
BAMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
BAMD Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYV
SPYV Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
SPYV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYV Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYV Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BAMD vs. SPYV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookstone Dividend Stock ETF (BAMD) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BAMDSPYVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.39

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.11

3.43

-2.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.91

13.16

-10.25

BAMD vs. SPYV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BAMD Sharpe Ratio is 0.72, which is lower than the SPYV Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BAMD and SPYV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BAMDSPYVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

2.17

-1.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.04

0.42

+0.62

Drawdowns

BAMD vs. SPYV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAMD drawdown since its inception was -15.91%, smaller than the maximum SPYV drawdown of -58.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAMD and SPYV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BAMDSPYVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.91%

-58.45%

+42.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.99%

-6.22%

-0.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.45%

-0.57%

-0.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.29%

-8.72%

+4.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.65%

1.62%

+1.03%

Volatility

BAMD vs. SPYV - Volatility Comparison

Brookstone Dividend Stock ETF (BAMD) has a higher volatility of 2.47% compared to SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV) at 1.98%. This indicates that BAMD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BAMDSPYVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.47%

1.98%

+0.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.83%

7.04%

-0.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.77%

9.84%

+0.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.35%

14.40%

-1.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.35%

16.94%

-3.59%

BAMD vs. SPYV - Expense Ratio Comparison

BAMD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYV's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

BAMD vs. SPYV - Dividend Comparison

BAMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.56%, more than SPYV's 1.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BAMD
Brookstone Dividend Stock ETF
3.56%3.86%4.21%0.70%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPYV
SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF
1.70%1.77%2.29%1.75%2.22%2.10%2.38%2.25%2.97%2.77%2.39%2.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


BAMD and SPYV have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BAMD has higher volatility (2.47%) compared to SPYV (1.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BAMD dropped -15.91% vs SPYV's -58.45%.

On 1-year performance, SPYV leads with 21.26% vs 7.69% for BAMD. On fees, SPYV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SPYV has been the lower-risk option at 1.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SPYV has performed better with a 21.26% return vs 7.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPYV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BAMD.

BAMD has the higher dividend yield at 3.56%, compared with 1.70% for SPYV.

BAMD is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while SPYV is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Brookstone and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BAMD and 0.04% for SPYV.

SPYV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BAMD and SPYV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer