BAMD vs. FDVV

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

BAMD (Brookstone Dividend Stock ETF) and FDVV (Fidelity High Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BAMD is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Brookstone, while FDVV is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Fidelity Core Dividend Index. BAMD is actively managed, while FDVV is passively managed. Over the past year, BAMD returned 11.67% vs 22.58% for FDVV. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BAMD charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for FDVV.

Performance

BAMD vs. FDVV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brookstone Dividend Stock ETF (BAMD) and Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BAMD achieves a 10.29% return, which is significantly higher than FDVV's 8.30% return.

BAMD

• 1D: 0.43%
• 1M: 0.63%
• YTD: 10.29%
• 6M: 10.07%
• 1Y: 11.67%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FDVV

• 1D: -0.33%
• 1M: 0.35%
• YTD: 8.30%
• 6M: 8.41%
• 1Y: 22.58%
• 3Y*: 19.87%
• 5Y*: 13.81%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BAMD vs. FDVV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
BAMD Brookstone Dividend Stock ETF	10.29%	-1.33%	19.76%	10.73%
FDVV Fidelity High Dividend ETF	8.30%	17.08%	21.81%	10.78%

Correlation

The correlation between BAMD and FDVV is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.68
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2023	0.69

The correlation between BAMD and FDVV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

BAMD vs. FDVV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BAMD	FDVV
Financial Services	26.4%	17.0%
Energy	14.8%	-
Technology	14.6%	30.5%
Consumer Defensive	12.6%	10.7%
Utilities	12.3%	8.6%
Industrials	4.4%	3.0%
Healthcare	4.2%	3.0%
Communication Services	4.0%	3.6%
Consumer Cyclical	3.7%	13.6%
Basic Materials	2.7%	-
Real Estate	0.5%	9.9%

Return for Risk

BAMD vs. FDVV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAMD

BAMD Risk / Return Rank: 31
BAMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
BAMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
BAMD Omega Ratio Rank: 28
BAMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
BAMD Martin Ratio Rank: 32

FDVV

FDVV Risk / Return Rank: 65
FDVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
FDVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
FDVV Omega Ratio Rank: 73
FDVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
FDVV Martin Ratio Rank: 59

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BAMD vs. FDVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookstone Dividend Stock ETF (BAMD) and Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BAMD	FDVV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.08	2.23	-1.16
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.61	3.12	-1.51
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.41	-0.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.68	2.44	-0.76
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.43	10.09	-5.66

BAMD vs. FDVV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BAMD Sharpe Ratio is 1.08, which is lower than the FDVV Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BAMD and FDVV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BAMD vs. FDVV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAMD drawdown since its inception was -15.91%, smaller than the maximum FDVV drawdown of -40.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAMD and FDVV.

Drawdown Indicators

	BAMD	FDVV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.91%	-40.25%	+24.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.99%	-9.30%	+2.31%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-15.90%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-20.18%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.03%	-1.39%	+0.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.22%	-3.79%	-0.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.64%	2.24%	+0.40%

Volatility

BAMD vs. FDVV - Volatility Comparison

Brookstone Dividend Stock ETF (BAMD) has a higher volatility of 3.28% compared to Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV) at 3.10%. This indicates that BAMD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BAMD	FDVV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.28%	3.10%	+0.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.14%	8.26%	-1.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.89%	10.17%	+0.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.32%	14.73%	-1.41%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.32%	16.97%	-3.65%

BAMD vs. FDVV - Expense Ratio Comparison

BAMD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than FDVV's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

BAMD vs. FDVV - Dividend Comparison

BAMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.49%, more than FDVV's 2.86% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
BAMD Brookstone Dividend Stock ETF	3.49%	3.86%	4.21%	0.70%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FDVV Fidelity High Dividend ETF	2.86%	2.89%	2.94%	3.77%	3.44%	2.70%	3.19%	3.93%	4.05%	3.66%	1.04%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BAMD and FDVV in my portfolio?

BAMD and FDVV have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BAMD or FDVV?

BAMD has higher volatility (3.28%) compared to FDVV (3.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BAMD dropped -15.91% vs FDVV's -40.25%.

Which ETF is better, BAMD or FDVV?

On 1-year performance, FDVV leads with 22.58% vs 11.67% for BAMD. On fees, FDVV is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, FDVV has been the lower-risk option at 3.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BAMD or FDVV?

Over the 1-year period, FDVV has performed better with a 22.58% return vs 11.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BAMD or FDVV?

FDVV is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BAMD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BAMD or FDVV?

BAMD has the higher dividend yield at 3.49%, compared with 2.86% for FDVV.

What is the main difference between BAMD and FDVV?

BAMD is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while FDVV is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Brookstone and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BAMD and 0.29% for FDVV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FDVV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.