PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BAMD vs. BAMV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BAMD vs. BAMV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brookstone Dividend Stock ETF (BAMD) and Brookstone Value Stock ETF (BAMV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with BAMD having a 14.83% return and BAMV slightly lower at 14.45%.


BAMD

1D
-0.44%
1M
2.20%
6M
10.21%
YTD
14.83%
1Y
14.82%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
15.42%

BAMV

1D
0.55%
1M
3.79%
6M
11.36%
YTD
14.45%
1Y
19.28%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
17.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$371.10K$400.27K$401.31K
$485.78K$484.91K$458.78K

BAMD vs. BAMV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
BAMD
Brookstone Dividend Stock ETF
14.83%-1.33%19.76%10.73%
BAMV
Brookstone Value Stock ETF
14.45%7.66%12.03%13.82%

Correlation

The correlation between BAMD and BAMV is 0.62, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2023

0.73

The correlation between BAMD and BAMV shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (1 year) to 0.73 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

BAMD vs. BAMV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BAMD
BAMV

Financial Services

26.8%
30.8%

Energy

14.8%
5.9%

Technology

13.5%
23.8%

Utilities

12.9%
0.4%

Consumer Defensive

12.4%
0.8%

Industrials

4.5%
10.7%

Healthcare

4.2%
9.8%

Communication Services

4.1%
8.0%

Consumer Cyclical

3.7%
2.3%

Basic Materials

2.6%
4.5%

Real Estate

0.6%
2.9%

Financial Services

BAMD
26.8%
BAMV
30.8%

Energy

BAMD
14.8%
BAMV
5.9%

Technology

BAMD
13.5%
BAMV
23.8%

Utilities

BAMD
12.9%
BAMV
0.4%

Consumer Defensive

BAMD
12.4%
BAMV
0.8%

Industrials

BAMD
4.5%
BAMV
10.7%

Healthcare

BAMD
4.2%
BAMV
9.8%

Communication Services

BAMD
4.1%
BAMV
8.0%

Consumer Cyclical

BAMD
3.7%
BAMV
2.3%

Basic Materials

BAMD
2.6%
BAMV
4.5%

Real Estate

BAMD
0.6%
BAMV
2.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BAMD vs. BAMV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BAMD
BAMD Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
BAMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BAMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
BAMD Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
BAMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
BAMD Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

BAMV
BAMV Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
BAMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BAMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
BAMV Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
BAMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
BAMV Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BAMD vs. BAMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookstone Dividend Stock ETF (BAMD) and Brookstone Value Stock ETF (BAMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BAMDBAMVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.27

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.14

2.97

-0.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.85

9.28

-3.43

BAMD vs. BAMV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BAMD Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is comparable to the BAMV Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BAMD and BAMV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BAMD vs. BAMV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAMD drawdown since its inception was -15.91%, which is greater than BAMV's maximum drawdown of -14.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAMD and BAMV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BAMDBAMVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.91%

-14.56%

-1.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.99%

-6.23%

-0.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.64%

0.00%

-1.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.07%

-1.94%

-2.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.55%

1.99%

+0.56%

Volatility

BAMD vs. BAMV - Volatility Comparison

Brookstone Dividend Stock ETF (BAMD) and Brookstone Value Stock ETF (BAMV) have volatilities of 3.03% and 3.01%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BAMDBAMVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.03%

3.01%

+0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.24%

8.56%

-1.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.50%

12.04%

-1.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.20%

13.59%

-0.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.20%

13.59%

-0.39%

BAMD vs. BAMV - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BAMD and BAMV have an expense ratio of 0.95%.


Dividends

BAMD vs. BAMV - Dividend Comparison

BAMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.36%, more than BAMV's 1.22% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
BAMD
Brookstone Dividend Stock ETF
3.36%3.86%4.21%0.70%
BAMV
Brookstone Value Stock ETF
1.22%1.32%3.66%0.19%

Frequently Asked Questions


BAMD and BAMV have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BAMD has higher volatility (3.03%) compared to BAMV (3.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BAMD dropped -15.91% vs BAMV's -14.56%.

On 1-year performance, BAMV leads with 19.28% vs 14.82% for BAMD. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BAMV has performed better with a 19.28% return vs 14.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BAMD and BAMV have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

BAMD has the higher dividend yield at 3.36%, compared with 1.22% for BAMV.

BAMV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BAMD and BAMV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer