PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BAMD vs. COWZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BAMD vs. COWZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brookstone Dividend Stock ETF (BAMD) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BAMD vs. COWZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
BAMD
Brookstone Dividend Stock ETF
4.34%-1.33%19.76%10.73%
COWZ
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF
4.30%8.98%10.64%4.91%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with BAMD having a 4.34% return and COWZ slightly lower at 4.30%.


BAMD

1D
0.75%
1M
-4.47%
YTD
4.34%
6M
1.10%
1Y
0.12%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

COWZ

1D
1.08%
1M
-3.36%
YTD
4.30%
6M
10.31%
1Y
16.75%
3Y*
12.26%
5Y*
11.01%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BAMD vs. COWZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

BAMD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than COWZ's 0.49% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BAMD vs. COWZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAMD
BAMD Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
BAMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BAMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
BAMD Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
BAMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
BAMD Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

COWZ
COWZ Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
COWZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COWZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
COWZ Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
COWZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
COWZ Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BAMD vs. COWZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookstone Dividend Stock ETF (BAMD) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BAMDCOWZDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.01

0.96

-0.95

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.11

1.44

-1.33

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.21

-0.20

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.11

1.30

-1.19

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.33

6.06

-5.73

BAMD vs. COWZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BAMD Sharpe Ratio is 0.01, which is lower than the COWZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BAMD and COWZ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BAMDCOWZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.01

0.96

-0.95

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.98

0.63

+0.35

Correlation

The correlation between BAMD and COWZ is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

BAMD vs. COWZ - Dividend Comparison

BAMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.68%, more than COWZ's 2.06% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BAMD
Brookstone Dividend Stock ETF
3.68%3.86%4.21%0.70%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
COWZ
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF
2.06%2.19%1.82%1.92%1.96%1.48%2.54%1.96%1.67%1.95%0.13%

Drawdowns

BAMD vs. COWZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAMD drawdown since its inception was -15.91%, smaller than the maximum COWZ drawdown of -38.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAMD and COWZ.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BAMDCOWZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.91%

-38.63%

+22.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.50%

-13.55%

+2.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.90%

-3.36%

-1.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.45%

-4.85%

+0.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.78%

2.91%

+0.87%

Volatility

BAMD vs. COWZ - Volatility Comparison

Brookstone Dividend Stock ETF (BAMD) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) have volatilities of 3.14% and 3.00%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BAMDCOWZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.14%

3.00%

+0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.77%

8.36%

-0.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.48%

17.50%

-3.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.60%

17.73%

-4.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.60%

20.08%

-6.48%