BAMD vs. COWZ
Compare and contrast key facts about Brookstone Dividend Stock ETF (BAMD) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ).
BAMD and COWZ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BAMD is an actively managed fund by Brookstone. It was launched on Sep 27, 2023. COWZ is a passively managed fund by Pacer that tracks the performance of the Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index. It was launched on Dec 16, 2016.
Performance
BAMD vs. COWZ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BAMD vs. COWZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BAMD Brookstone Dividend Stock ETF | 4.34% | -1.33% | 19.76% | 10.73% |
COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF | 4.30% | 8.98% | 10.64% | 4.91% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with BAMD having a 4.34% return and COWZ slightly lower at 4.30%.
BAMD
- 1D
- 0.75%
- 1M
- -4.47%
- YTD
- 4.34%
- 6M
- 1.10%
- 1Y
- 0.12%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COWZ
- 1D
- 1.08%
- 1M
- -3.36%
- YTD
- 4.30%
- 6M
- 10.31%
- 1Y
- 16.75%
- 3Y*
- 12.26%
- 5Y*
- 11.01%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BAMD vs. COWZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
BAMD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than COWZ's 0.49% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BAMD vs. COWZ — Risk / Return Rank
BAMD
COWZ
BAMD vs. COWZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookstone Dividend Stock ETF (BAMD) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BAMD | COWZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.01 | 0.96 | -0.95 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.11 | 1.44 | -1.33 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.21 | -0.20 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.11 | 1.30 | -1.19 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.33 | 6.06 | -5.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BAMD | COWZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 | 0.96 | -0.95 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.62 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.98 | 0.63 | +0.35 |
Correlation
The correlation between BAMD and COWZ is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
BAMD vs. COWZ - Dividend Comparison
BAMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.68%, more than COWZ's 2.06% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAMD Brookstone Dividend Stock ETF | 3.68% | 3.86% | 4.21% | 0.70% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF | 2.06% | 2.19% | 1.82% | 1.92% | 1.96% | 1.48% | 2.54% | 1.96% | 1.67% | 1.95% | 0.13% |
Drawdowns
BAMD vs. COWZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BAMD drawdown since its inception was -15.91%, smaller than the maximum COWZ drawdown of -38.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAMD and COWZ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BAMD | COWZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.91% | -38.63% | +22.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.50% | -13.55% | +2.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.90% | -3.36% | -1.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.45% | -4.85% | +0.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.78% | 2.91% | +0.87% |
Volatility
BAMD vs. COWZ - Volatility Comparison
Brookstone Dividend Stock ETF (BAMD) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) have volatilities of 3.14% and 3.00%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BAMD | COWZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.14% | 3.00% | +0.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.77% | 8.36% | -0.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.48% | 17.50% | -3.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.60% | 17.73% | -4.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.60% | 20.08% | -6.48% |