BAMD vs. CGDV

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Brookstone Dividend Stock ETF (BAMD) and Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV).

BAMD and CGDV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BAMD is an actively managed fund by Brookstone. It was launched on Sep 27, 2023. CGDV is an actively managed fund by Capital Group. It was launched on Feb 22, 2022.

Performance

BAMD vs. CGDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brookstone Dividend Stock ETF (BAMD) and Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BAMD vs. CGDV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
BAMD Brookstone Dividend Stock ETF	4.34%	-1.33%	19.76%	10.73%
CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF	-2.26%	25.50%	20.10%	12.68%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BAMD achieves a 4.34% return, which is significantly higher than CGDV's -2.26% return.

BAMD

• 1D: 0.75%
• 1M: -4.47%
• YTD: 4.34%
• 6M: 1.10%
• 1Y: 0.12%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CGDV

• 1D: 2.88%
• 1M: -6.44%
• YTD: -2.26%
• 6M: 1.93%
• 1Y: 20.99%
• 3Y*: 21.38%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BAMD vs. CGDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

BAMD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than CGDV's 0.33% expense ratio.

BAMD

Brookstone Dividend Stock ETF

CGDV

Capital Group Dividend Value ETF

Return for Risk

BAMD vs. CGDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAMD

BAMD Risk / Return Rank: 12
BAMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
BAMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
BAMD Omega Ratio Rank: 11
BAMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
BAMD Martin Ratio Rank: 14

CGDV

CGDV Risk / Return Rank: 78
CGDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
CGDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
CGDV Omega Ratio Rank: 78
CGDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
CGDV Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BAMD vs. CGDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookstone Dividend Stock ETF (BAMD) and Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BAMD	CGDV	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.01	1.26	-1.25
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.11	1.83	-1.72
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.01	1.28	-0.27
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.11	2.01	-1.90
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.33	8.64	-8.31
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BAMD vs. CGDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BAMD Sharpe Ratio is 0.01, which is lower than the CGDV Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BAMD and CGDV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BAMD	CGDV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.01	1.26	-1.25
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.98	1.04	-0.06

Correlation

The correlation between BAMD and CGDV is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

BAMD vs. CGDV - Dividend Comparison

BAMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.68%, more than CGDV's 1.34% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
BAMD Brookstone Dividend Stock ETF	3.68%	3.86%	4.21%	0.70%	0.00%
CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF	1.34%	1.29%	1.60%	1.65%	1.36%

Drawdowns

BAMD vs. CGDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAMD drawdown since its inception was -15.91%, smaller than the maximum CGDV drawdown of -21.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAMD and CGDV.

Drawdown Indicators

	BAMD	CGDV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.91%	-21.82%	+5.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.50%	-10.91%	-0.59%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.90%	-7.15%	+2.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.45%	-3.72%	-0.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.78%	2.54%	+1.24%

Volatility

BAMD vs. CGDV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Brookstone Dividend Stock ETF (BAMD) is 3.14%, while Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV) has a volatility of 5.60%. This indicates that BAMD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CGDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BAMD	CGDV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.14%	5.60%	-2.46%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.77%	9.27%	-1.50%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.48%	16.77%	-2.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.60%	15.62%	-2.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.60%	15.62%	-2.02%