PortfoliosLab logo
BAMD vs. CGDV
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between BAMD and CGDV is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

BAMD vs. CGDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brookstone Dividend Stock ETF (BAMD) and Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

20.00%25.00%30.00%35.00%40.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
28.97%
36.04%
BAMD
CGDV

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

BAMD:

0.78

CGDV:

0.78

Sortino Ratio

BAMD:

1.15

CGDV:

1.19

Omega Ratio

BAMD:

1.16

CGDV:

1.18

Calmar Ratio

BAMD:

0.74

CGDV:

0.91

Martin Ratio

BAMD:

2.29

CGDV:

3.83

Ulcer Index

BAMD:

5.14%

CGDV:

3.38%

Daily Std Dev

BAMD:

15.10%

CGDV:

16.67%

Max Drawdown

BAMD:

-15.91%

CGDV:

-21.81%

Current Drawdown

BAMD:

-10.17%

CGDV:

-5.12%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BAMD achieves a -2.75% return, which is significantly lower than CGDV's 0.53% return.


BAMD

YTD

-2.75%

1M

2.83%

6M

-5.62%

1Y

11.09%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

CGDV

YTD

0.53%

1M

9.31%

6M

-1.22%

1Y

10.24%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BAMD vs. CGDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

BAMD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than CGDV's 0.33% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

BAMD vs. CGDV — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAMD
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BAMD is 6868
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BAMD is 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BAMD is 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BAMD is 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BAMD is 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BAMD is 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

CGDV
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CGDV is 7272
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CGDV is 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CGDV is 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CGDV is 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CGDV is 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CGDV is 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

BAMD vs. CGDV - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookstone Dividend Stock ETF (BAMD) and Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current BAMD Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is comparable to the CGDV Sharpe Ratio of 0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BAMD and CGDV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
0.78
0.78
BAMD
CGDV

Dividends

BAMD vs. CGDV - Dividend Comparison

BAMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.49%, more than CGDV's 1.62% yield.


TTM202420232022
BAMD
Brookstone Dividend Stock ETF
4.49%4.21%0.70%0.00%
CGDV
Capital Group Dividend Value ETF
1.62%1.60%1.65%1.36%

Drawdowns

BAMD vs. CGDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAMD drawdown since its inception was -15.91%, smaller than the maximum CGDV drawdown of -21.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAMD and CGDV. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-10.17%
-5.12%
BAMD
CGDV

Volatility

BAMD vs. CGDV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Brookstone Dividend Stock ETF (BAMD) is 7.53%, while Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV) has a volatility of 9.71%. This indicates that BAMD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CGDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
7.53%
9.71%
BAMD
CGDV