PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BAMD vs. SCHV
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BAMD vs. SCHV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brookstone Dividend Stock ETF (BAMD) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BAMD vs. SCHV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
BAMD
Brookstone Dividend Stock ETF
4.34%-1.33%19.76%10.73%
SCHV
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF
3.48%16.02%14.13%9.01%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BAMD achieves a 4.34% return, which is significantly higher than SCHV's 3.48% return.


BAMD

1D
0.75%
1M
-4.47%
YTD
4.34%
6M
1.10%
1Y
0.12%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SCHV

1D
2.01%
1M
-4.93%
YTD
3.48%
6M
5.85%
1Y
17.14%
3Y*
14.31%
5Y*
9.28%
10Y*
10.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BAMD vs. SCHV - Expense Ratio Comparison

BAMD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHV's 0.04% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BAMD vs. SCHV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAMD
BAMD Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
BAMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BAMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
BAMD Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
BAMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
BAMD Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHV
SCHV Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
SCHV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHV Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHV Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BAMD vs. SCHV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookstone Dividend Stock ETF (BAMD) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BAMDSCHVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.01

1.12

-1.11

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.11

1.60

-1.49

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.24

-0.22

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.11

1.53

-1.43

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.33

7.23

-6.90

BAMD vs. SCHV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BAMD Sharpe Ratio is 0.01, which is lower than the SCHV Sharpe Ratio of 1.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BAMD and SCHV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BAMDSCHVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.01

1.12

-1.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.98

0.68

+0.30

Correlation

The correlation between BAMD and SCHV is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

BAMD vs. SCHV - Dividend Comparison

BAMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.68%, more than SCHV's 1.97% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BAMD
Brookstone Dividend Stock ETF
3.68%3.86%4.21%0.70%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCHV
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF
1.97%2.02%2.25%2.42%2.37%1.93%3.03%3.02%3.05%2.37%2.65%2.69%

Drawdowns

BAMD vs. SCHV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAMD drawdown since its inception was -15.91%, smaller than the maximum SCHV drawdown of -37.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAMD and SCHV.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BAMDSCHVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.91%

-37.08%

+21.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.50%

-11.93%

+0.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.90%

-4.96%

+0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.45%

-3.86%

-0.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.78%

2.53%

+1.25%

Volatility

BAMD vs. SCHV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Brookstone Dividend Stock ETF (BAMD) is 3.14%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV) has a volatility of 4.24%. This indicates that BAMD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BAMDSCHVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.14%

4.24%

-1.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.77%

8.08%

-0.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.48%

15.44%

-0.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.60%

14.48%

-0.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.60%

16.91%

-3.31%