BAIV vs. EFAS

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

BAIV (Brown Advisory International Value Select ETF) and EFAS (Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. BAIV is actively managed, while EFAS is passively managed. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BAIV charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for EFAS.

Performance

BAIV vs. EFAS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brown Advisory International Value Select ETF (BAIV) and Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

BAIV

• 1D: 0.56%
• 1M: 0.29%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EFAS

• 1D: -0.26%
• 1M: -3.06%
• YTD: 12.03%
• 6M: 11.93%
• 1Y: 25.30%
• 3Y*: 24.65%
• 5Y*: 12.12%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BAIV vs. EFAS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
BAIV Brown Advisory International Value Select ETF	0.07%
EFAS Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF	0.85%

Correlation

The correlation between BAIV and EFAS is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2026	0.57

Return for Risk

BAIV vs. EFAS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAIV

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

EFAS

EFAS Risk / Return Rank: 81
EFAS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
EFAS Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
EFAS Omega Ratio Rank: 77
EFAS Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
EFAS Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BAIV vs. EFAS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brown Advisory International Value Select ETF (BAIV) and Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BAIV	EFAS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.32	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	3.29	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.40	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	4.79	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	12.23	—

Drawdowns

BAIV vs. EFAS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAIV drawdown since its inception was -11.41%, smaller than the maximum EFAS drawdown of -44.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAIV and EFAS.

Drawdown Indicators

	BAIV	EFAS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.41%	-44.38%	+32.97%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-5.30%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-11.84%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-28.81%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.99%	-3.81%	+1.82%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.66%	-7.05%	+3.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.07%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BAIV	EFAS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.47%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	8.69%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.56%	10.95%	+7.61%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.56%	15.58%	+2.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.56%	18.30%	+0.26%

BAIV vs. EFAS - Expense Ratio Comparison

BAIV has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than EFAS's 0.56% expense ratio.

Dividends

BAIV vs. EFAS - Dividend Comparison

BAIV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EFAS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.76%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
BAIV Brown Advisory International Value Select ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
EFAS Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF	4.76%	4.83%	6.76%	6.33%	7.28%	5.19%	4.34%	5.75%	6.63%	6.15%	0.21%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BAIV and EFAS in my portfolio?

BAIV and EFAS have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BAIV or EFAS?

On fees, EFAS is cheaper at 0.56% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BAIV or EFAS?

EFAS is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for BAIV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BAIV or EFAS?

EFAS has the higher dividend yield at 4.76%, compared with 0.00% for BAIV.

What is the main difference between BAIV and EFAS?

They also come from different issuers: Brown Advisory and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for BAIV and 0.56% for EFAS.