BAIV vs. PATN
BAIV (Brown Advisory International Value Select ETF) and PATN (Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. BAIV is actively managed, while PATN is passively managed. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BAIV charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for PATN.
Performance
BAIV vs. PATN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BAIV
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- 2.26%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PATN
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- 16.77%
- YTD
- 40.52%
- 6M
- 44.04%
- 1Y
- 73.16%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BAIV vs. PATN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BAIV Brown Advisory International Value Select ETF | -0.83% |
PATN Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF | 18.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between BAIV and PATN is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2026 | 0.69 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BAIV vs. PATN — Risk / Return Rank
BAIV
PATN
BAIV vs. PATN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brown Advisory International Value Select ETF (BAIV) and Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF (PATN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BAIV | PATN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 3.47 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.16 | 2.28 | -2.44 |
Drawdowns
BAIV vs. PATN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BAIV drawdown since its inception was -11.41%, smaller than the maximum PATN drawdown of -16.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAIV and PATN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BAIV | PATN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.41% | -16.77% | +5.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -14.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.92% | -0.39% | -0.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.26% | -3.15% | -1.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.55% | — |
Volatility
BAIV vs. PATN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BAIV | PATN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 8.84% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 18.16% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.45% | 21.18% | -1.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.45% | 20.85% | -1.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.45% | 20.85% | -1.40% |
BAIV vs. PATN - Expense Ratio Comparison
BAIV has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than PATN's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
BAIV vs. PATN - Dividend Comparison
BAIV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PATN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.60%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BAIV Brown Advisory International Value Select ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PATN Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF | 1.60% | 2.25% | 0.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BAIV and PATN have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BAIV is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BAIV is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for PATN.
PATN has the higher dividend yield at 1.60%, compared with 0.00% for BAIV.
They also come from different issuers: Brown Advisory and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for BAIV and 0.65% for PATN.
Find the right allocation for BAIV and PATN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer