BAIV vs. UMMA
BAIV (Brown Advisory International Value Select ETF) and UMMA (Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. BAIV is actively managed, while UMMA is passively managed. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BAIV charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for UMMA.
Performance
BAIV vs. UMMA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BAIV
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- 2.38%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UMMA
- 1D
- 1.04%
- 1M
- 14.73%
- YTD
- 33.52%
- 6M
- 37.91%
- 1Y
- 54.63%
- 3Y*
- 23.05%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BAIV vs. UMMA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BAIV Brown Advisory International Value Select ETF | 0.09% |
UMMA Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF | 14.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between BAIV and UMMA is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2026 | 0.75 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BAIV vs. UMMA — Risk / Return Rank
BAIV
UMMA
BAIV vs. UMMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brown Advisory International Value Select ETF (BAIV) and Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF (UMMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BAIV | UMMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.73 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.02 | 0.59 | -0.57 |
Drawdowns
BAIV vs. UMMA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BAIV drawdown since its inception was -11.41%, smaller than the maximum UMMA drawdown of -34.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAIV and UMMA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BAIV | UMMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.41% | -34.17% | +22.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -14.93% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.73% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.31% | -9.83% | +5.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.82% | — |
Volatility
BAIV vs. UMMA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BAIV | UMMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.60% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 17.23% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.51% | 20.10% | -0.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.51% | 20.56% | -1.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.51% | 20.56% | -1.05% |
BAIV vs. UMMA - Expense Ratio Comparison
BAIV has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than UMMA's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
BAIV vs. UMMA - Dividend Comparison
BAIV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UMMA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAIV Brown Advisory International Value Select ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UMMA Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF | 0.92% | 1.02% | 0.91% | 1.09% | 1.77% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BAIV and UMMA have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BAIV is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BAIV is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for UMMA.
UMMA has the higher dividend yield at 0.92%, compared with 0.00% for BAIV.
They also come from different issuers: Brown Advisory and Wahed. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for BAIV and 0.65% for UMMA.
Find the right allocation for BAIV and UMMA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer