PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BAIV vs. UMMA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BAIV vs. UMMA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brown Advisory International Value Select ETF (BAIV) and Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF (UMMA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


BAIV

1D
0.37%
1M
2.38%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

UMMA

1D
1.04%
1M
14.73%
YTD
33.52%
6M
37.91%
1Y
54.63%
3Y*
23.05%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BAIV vs. UMMA - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BAIV and UMMA is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2026

0.75

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BAIV vs. UMMA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAIV

UMMA
UMMA Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
UMMA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UMMA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
UMMA Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
UMMA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
UMMA Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BAIV vs. UMMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brown Advisory International Value Select ETF (BAIV) and Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF (UMMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BAIV vs. UMMA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BAIVUMMADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.73

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.02

0.59

-0.57

Drawdowns

BAIV vs. UMMA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAIV drawdown since its inception was -11.41%, smaller than the maximum UMMA drawdown of -34.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAIV and UMMA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BAIVUMMADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.41%

-34.17%

+22.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.31%

-9.83%

+5.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.82%

Volatility

BAIV vs. UMMA - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BAIVUMMADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.51%

20.10%

-0.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.51%

20.56%

-1.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.51%

20.56%

-1.05%

BAIV vs. UMMA - Expense Ratio Comparison

BAIV has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than UMMA's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

BAIV vs. UMMA - Dividend Comparison

BAIV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UMMA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BAIV
Brown Advisory International Value Select ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UMMA
Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF
0.92%1.02%0.91%1.09%1.77%

Frequently Asked Questions


BAIV and UMMA have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BAIV is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BAIV is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for UMMA.

UMMA has the higher dividend yield at 0.92%, compared with 0.00% for BAIV.

They also come from different issuers: Brown Advisory and Wahed. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for BAIV and 0.65% for UMMA.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BAIV and UMMA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer