BAC vs. SHW
BAC (Bank of America Corporation) and SHW (The Sherwin-Williams Company) are both stocks. BAC operates in Banks - Diversified (Financial Services), while SHW operates in Specialty Chemicals (Basic Materials). Over the past 10 years, BAC returned 18.19%/yr vs 13.58%/yr for SHW. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BAC vs. SHW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BAC achieves a 3.72% return, which is significantly higher than SHW's -1.61% return. Over the past 10 years, BAC has outperformed SHW with an annualized return of 18.19%, while SHW has yielded a comparatively lower 13.58% annualized return.
BAC
- 1D
- 2.31%
- 1M
- 13.82%
- YTD
- 3.72%
- 6M
- 3.46%
- 1Y
- 29.23%
- 3Y*
- 27.43%
- 5Y*
- 8.79%
- 10Y*
- 18.19%
SHW
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 3.85%
- YTD
- -1.61%
- 6M
- -3.00%
- 1Y
- -10.09%
- 3Y*
- 9.64%
- 5Y*
- 3.70%
- 10Y*
- 13.58%
BAC vs. SHW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAC Bank of America Corporation | 3.72% | 28.04% | 33.85% | 4.83% | -23.82% | 49.61% | -11.63% | 46.19% | -15.00% | 35.69% |
SHW The Sherwin-Williams Company | -1.61% | -3.83% | 9.90% | 32.73% | -31.96% | 44.90% | 27.05% | 49.70% | -3.23% | 54.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between BAC and SHW is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 1986 | 0.33 |
Fundamentals
BAC:
$415.53B
SHW:
$78.72B
BAC:
$4.19
SHW:
$10.42
BAC:
13.36
SHW:
30.45
BAC:
5.36
SHW:
2.96
BAC:
2.42
SHW:
3.31
BAC:
1.51
SHW:
17.77
BAC:
$174.85B
SHW:
$23.94B
BAC:
$110.47B
SHW:
$11.76B
BAC:
$41.74B
SHW:
$4.29B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BAC vs. SHW — Risk / Return Rank
BAC
SHW
BAC vs. SHW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bank of America Corporation (BAC) and The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BAC | SHW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 0.95 | +0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.64 | -0.47 | +2.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.21 | -0.99 | +5.20 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BAC vs. SHW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BAC drawdown since its inception was -93.10%, which is greater than SHW's maximum drawdown of -52.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAC and SHW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BAC | SHW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.10% | -52.02% | -41.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.93% | -21.36% | +3.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.51% | -25.69% | -1.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.64% | -42.46% | -4.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.95% | -42.46% | -6.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.36% | -19.53% | +19.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.30% | -11.63% | -16.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.96% | 10.28% | -3.32% |
Volatility
BAC vs. SHW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Bank of America Corporation (BAC) is 5.49%, while The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW) has a volatility of 9.00%. This indicates that BAC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SHW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BAC | SHW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.49% | 9.00% | -3.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.57% | 19.26% | -2.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.62% | 25.46% | -3.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.89% | 26.27% | +0.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.68% | 26.58% | +4.10% |
Dividends
BAC vs. SHW - Dividend Comparison
BAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.72%, more than SHW's 1.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAC Bank of America Corporation | 2.72% | 1.96% | 2.28% | 2.73% | 2.60% | 1.75% | 2.38% | 1.87% | 2.19% | 1.32% | 1.13% | 1.19% |
SHW The Sherwin-Williams Company | 1.00% | 0.98% | 0.84% | 0.78% | 1.01% | 0.62% | 0.73% | 0.77% | 0.87% | 0.83% | 1.25% | 1.03% |
Financials
BAC vs. SHW - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bank of America Corporation and The Sherwin-Williams Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BAC vs. SHW - Profitability Comparison
BAC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bank of America Corporation reported a gross profit of 28.94B and revenue of 30.27B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 95.6%.
SHW - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Sherwin-Williams Company reported a gross profit of 2.78B and revenue of 5.67B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.1%.
BAC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bank of America Corporation reported an operating income of 10.40B and revenue of 30.27B, resulting in an operating margin of 34.4%.
SHW - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Sherwin-Williams Company reported an operating income of 810.90M and revenue of 5.67B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.3%.
BAC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bank of America Corporation reported a net income of 8.58B and revenue of 30.27B, resulting in a net margin of 28.4%.
SHW - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Sherwin-Williams Company reported a net income of 534.70M and revenue of 5.67B, resulting in a net margin of 9.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BAC and SHW have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SHW has higher volatility (9.00%) compared to BAC (5.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BAC dropped -93.10% vs SHW's -52.02%.
BAC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs -0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BAC and SHW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer