PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
BAC vs. XLF
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between BAC and XLF is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.00.8

Performance

BAC vs. XLF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bank of America Corporation (BAC) and Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

100.00%200.00%300.00%400.00%500.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
184.32%
457.40%
BAC
XLF

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

BAC:

1.47

XLF:

2.06

Sortino Ratio

BAC:

2.27

XLF:

2.96

Omega Ratio

BAC:

1.27

XLF:

1.38

Calmar Ratio

BAC:

1.04

XLF:

3.99

Martin Ratio

BAC:

6.04

XLF:

14.03

Ulcer Index

BAC:

5.54%

XLF:

2.08%

Daily Std Dev

BAC:

22.71%

XLF:

14.16%

Max Drawdown

BAC:

-93.45%

XLF:

-82.43%

Current Drawdown

BAC:

-8.43%

XLF:

-7.23%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BAC achieves a 32.48% return, which is significantly higher than XLF's 28.12% return. Over the past 10 years, BAC has underperformed XLF with an annualized return of 11.79%, while XLF has yielded a comparatively higher 13.56% annualized return.


BAC

YTD

32.48%

1M

-6.37%

6M

10.10%

1Y

33.12%

5Y*

7.12%

10Y*

11.79%

XLF

YTD

28.12%

1M

-4.78%

6M

16.29%

1Y

28.22%

5Y*

11.30%

10Y*

13.56%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

BAC vs. XLF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bank of America Corporation (BAC) and Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BAC, currently valued at 1.47, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.001.472.06
The chart of Sortino ratio for BAC, currently valued at 2.27, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.272.96
The chart of Omega ratio for BAC, currently valued at 1.27, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.271.38
The chart of Calmar ratio for BAC, currently valued at 1.04, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.043.99
The chart of Martin ratio for BAC, currently valued at 6.04, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.006.0414.03
BAC
XLF

The current BAC Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is comparable to the XLF Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BAC and XLF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.002.003.004.00JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
1.47
2.06
BAC
XLF

Dividends

BAC vs. XLF - Dividend Comparison

BAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.30%, more than XLF's 1.01% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
BAC
Bank of America Corporation
2.30%2.73%2.60%1.75%2.38%1.87%2.19%1.32%1.13%1.19%0.67%0.26%
XLF
Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund
1.01%1.71%2.04%1.63%2.03%1.86%2.09%1.48%1.63%2.40%1.98%1.81%

Drawdowns

BAC vs. XLF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAC drawdown since its inception was -93.45%, which is greater than XLF's maximum drawdown of -82.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAC and XLF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-8.43%
-7.23%
BAC
XLF

Volatility

BAC vs. XLF - Volatility Comparison

Bank of America Corporation (BAC) has a higher volatility of 5.10% compared to Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF) at 4.16%. This indicates that BAC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
5.10%
4.16%
BAC
XLF
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab