BAC vs. XLF

In the year-to-date period, BAC achieves a -9.12% return, which is significantly lower than XLF's -0.28% return. Over the past 10 years, BAC has underperformed XLF with an annualized return of 12.13%, while XLF has yielded a comparatively higher 13.86% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bank of America Corporation (BAC) and Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current BAC Sharpe Ratio is 0.21, which is lower than the XLF Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BAC and XLF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

BAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.57%, more than XLF's 1.48% yield.

The maximum BAC drawdown since its inception was -93.45%, which is greater than XLF's maximum drawdown of -82.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAC and XLF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Bank of America Corporation (BAC) has a higher volatility of 18.10% compared to Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF) at 13.51%. This indicates that BAC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.