SHW vs. MAS
SHW (The Sherwin-Williams Company) and MAS (Masco Corporation) are both stocks. SHW operates in Specialty Chemicals (Basic Materials), while MAS operates in Building Products & Equipment (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, SHW returned 13.89%/yr vs 11.00%/yr for MAS. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SHW vs. MAS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SHW achieves a -1.73% return, which is significantly lower than MAS's 17.00% return. Over the past 10 years, SHW has outperformed MAS with an annualized return of 13.89%, while MAS has yielded a comparatively lower 11.00% annualized return.
SHW
- 1D
- -1.21%
- 1M
- 2.53%
- YTD
- -1.73%
- 6M
- -1.67%
- 1Y
- -4.09%
- 3Y*
- 9.62%
- 5Y*
- 4.08%
- 10Y*
- 13.89%
MAS
- 1D
- -1.08%
- 1M
- 9.40%
- YTD
- 17.00%
- 6M
- 15.54%
- 1Y
- 22.50%
- 3Y*
- 11.98%
- 5Y*
- 6.94%
- 10Y*
- 11.00%
SHW vs. MAS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SHW The Sherwin-Williams Company | -1.73% | -3.83% | 9.90% | 32.73% | -31.96% | 44.90% | 27.05% | 49.70% | -3.23% | 54.11% |
MAS Masco Corporation | 17.00% | -10.92% | 10.04% | 46.56% | -32.09% | 29.61% | 15.78% | 66.27% | -32.70% | 40.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between SHW and MAS is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 1985 | 0.43 |
Over the past year, SHW and MAS have become more correlated (0.72) than their long-term average of 0.43, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
SHW:
$78.62B
MAS:
$14.93B
SHW:
$10.42
MAS:
$4.02
SHW:
30.41
MAS:
18.28
SHW:
2.96
MAS:
0.56
SHW:
3.30
MAS:
1.99
SHW:
$23.94B
MAS:
$7.68B
SHW:
$11.76B
MAS:
$2.72B
SHW:
$4.29B
MAS:
$1.39B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SHW vs. MAS — Risk / Return Rank
SHW
MAS
SHW vs. MAS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW) and Masco Corporation (MAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SHW | MAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.86 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.15 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.19 | 0.93 | -1.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.39 | 1.91 | -2.30 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SHW vs. MAS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SHW drawdown since its inception was -52.02%, smaller than the maximum MAS drawdown of -88.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHW and MAS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SHW | MAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.02% | -88.75% | +36.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.36% | -24.38% | +3.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.69% | -30.95% | +5.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.46% | -37.95% | -4.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.46% | -44.83% | +2.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.63% | -11.43% | -8.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.63% | -23.62% | +11.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.42% | 11.82% | -1.40% |
Volatility
SHW vs. MAS - Volatility Comparison
The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW) and Masco Corporation (MAS) have volatilities of 8.71% and 8.57%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SHW | MAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.71% | 8.57% | +0.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.62% | 26.10% | -6.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.11% | 32.48% | -7.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.32% | 30.09% | -3.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.62% | 29.47% | -2.85% |
Dividends
SHW vs. MAS - Dividend Comparison
SHW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, less than MAS's 1.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MAS Masco Corporation | 1.71% | 1.95% | 1.60% | 1.70% | 2.40% | 1.20% | 0.99% | 1.03% | 1.49% | 0.92% | 1.22% | 12.68% |
SHW The Sherwin-Williams Company | 1.00% | 0.98% | 0.84% | 0.78% | 1.01% | 0.62% | 0.73% | 0.77% | 0.87% | 0.83% | 1.25% | 1.03% |
Financials
SHW vs. MAS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Sherwin-Williams Company and Masco Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SHW vs. MAS - Profitability Comparison
SHW - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Sherwin-Williams Company reported a gross profit of 2.78B and revenue of 5.67B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.1%.
MAS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Masco Corporation reported a gross profit of 686.00M and revenue of 1.92B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.8%.
SHW - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Sherwin-Williams Company reported an operating income of 810.90M and revenue of 5.67B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.3%.
MAS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Masco Corporation reported an operating income of 316.00M and revenue of 1.92B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.5%.
SHW - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Sherwin-Williams Company reported a net income of 534.70M and revenue of 5.67B, resulting in a net margin of 9.4%.
MAS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Masco Corporation reported a net income of 213.00M and revenue of 1.92B, resulting in a net margin of 11.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SHW and MAS have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SHW has higher volatility (8.71%) compared to MAS (8.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHW dropped -52.02% vs MAS's -88.75%.
MAS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.70 vs -0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SHW and MAS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer