SHW vs. MAS
SHW (The Sherwin-Williams Company) and MAS (Masco Corporation) are both stocks. SHW operates in Specialty Chemicals (Basic Materials), while MAS operates in Building Products & Equipment (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, SHW returned 14.02%/yr vs 8.61%/yr for MAS. Their 0.43 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
SHW vs. MAS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SHW achieves a 5.70% return, which is significantly lower than MAS's 13.66% return. Over the past 10 years, SHW has outperformed MAS with an annualized return of 14.02%, while MAS has yielded a comparatively lower 8.61% annualized return.
SHW
- 1D
- -1.16%
- 1M
- -3.30%
- 6M
- -3.43%
- YTD
- 5.70%
- 1Y
- 0.18%
- 3Y*
- 7.70%
- 5Y*
- 4.14%
- 10Y*
- 14.02%
- ALL TIME*
- 15.70%
MAS
- 1D
- -0.87%
- 1M
- -13.64%
- 6M
- 9.14%
- YTD
- 13.66%
- 1Y
- 5.79%
- 3Y*
- 7.04%
- 5Y*
- 5.61%
- 10Y*
- 8.61%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.81%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $263.34M | $211.20M | $193.49M | |
| $789.11M | $700.63M | $775.31M |
SHW vs. MAS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SHW The Sherwin-Williams Company | 5.70% | -3.83% | 9.90% | 32.73% | -31.96% | 44.90% | 27.05% | 49.70% | -3.23% | 54.11% |
MAS Masco Corporation | 13.66% | -10.92% | 10.04% | 46.56% | -32.09% | 29.61% | 15.78% | 66.27% | -32.70% | 40.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between SHW and MAS is 0.74, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.72 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.72 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 1985 | 0.43 |
Over the past year, SHW and MAS have become more correlated (0.74) than their long-term average of 0.43, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
SHW:
$82.74B
MAS:
$14.09B
SHW:
$10.83
MAS:
$4.32
SHW:
31.48
MAS:
16.55
SHW:
3.06
MAS:
0.51
SHW:
3.47
MAS:
1.92
SHW:
$24.41B
MAS:
$7.62B
SHW:
$11.98B
MAS:
$2.81B
SHW:
$4.46B
MAS:
$1.45B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SHW vs. MAS — Risk / Return Rank
SHW
MAS
SHW vs. MAS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW) and Masco Corporation (MAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SHW | MAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.07 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.19 | 0.28 | -0.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.36 | 0.58 | -0.21 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SHW vs. MAS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SHW drawdown since its inception was -52.02%, smaller than the maximum MAS drawdown of -88.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHW and MAS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SHW | MAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.02% | -88.75% | +36.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.36% | -24.38% | +3.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.69% | -30.95% | +5.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.46% | -37.95% | -4.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.46% | -44.83% | +2.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.55% | -13.96% | +0.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.64% | -23.58% | +11.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.94% | 11.98% | -1.04% |
Volatility
SHW vs. MAS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW) is 11.95%, while Masco Corporation (MAS) has a volatility of 14.67%. This indicates that SHW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MAS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SHW | MAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.95% | 14.67% | -2.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.80% | 29.23% | -7.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.30% | 35.12% | -7.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.85% | 30.82% | -3.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.76% | 29.71% | -2.95% |
Dividends
SHW vs. MAS - Dividend Comparison
SHW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, less than MAS's 1.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MAS Masco Corporation | 1.76% | 1.95% | 1.60% | 1.70% | 2.40% | 1.20% | 0.99% | 1.03% | 1.49% | 0.92% | 1.22% | 12.68% |
SHW The Sherwin-Williams Company | 0.93% | 0.98% | 0.84% | 0.78% | 1.01% | 0.62% | 0.73% | 0.77% | 0.87% | 0.83% | 1.25% | 1.03% |
Financials
SHW vs. MAS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Sherwin-Williams Company and Masco Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SHW vs. MAS - Profitability Comparison
SHW - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Sherwin-Williams Company reported a gross profit of 3.34B and revenue of 6.79B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.2%.
MAS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Masco Corporation reported a gross profit of 868.00M and revenue of 1.99B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 43.6%.
SHW - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Sherwin-Williams Company reported an operating income of 1.23B and revenue of 6.79B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.1%.
MAS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Masco Corporation reported an operating income of 470.00M and revenue of 1.99B, resulting in an operating margin of 23.6%.
SHW - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Sherwin-Williams Company reported a net income of 843.60M and revenue of 6.79B, resulting in a net margin of 12.4%.
MAS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Masco Corporation reported a net income of 318.00M and revenue of 1.99B, resulting in a net margin of 16.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SHW and MAS have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MAS has higher volatility (14.67%) compared to SHW (11.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHW dropped -52.02% vs MAS's -88.75%.
MAS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.20 vs 0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SHW and MAS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer