SHW vs. RS
SHW (The Sherwin-Williams Company) and RS (Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co.) are both stocks. Both are in the Basic Materials sector — SHW in Specialty Chemicals, RS in Steel. Over the past 10 years, SHW returned 13.89%/yr vs 20.79%/yr for RS. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SHW vs. RS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SHW achieves a -1.73% return, which is significantly lower than RS's 40.72% return. Over the past 10 years, SHW has underperformed RS with an annualized return of 13.89%, while RS has yielded a comparatively higher 20.79% annualized return.
SHW
- 1D
- -1.21%
- 1M
- 2.53%
- YTD
- -1.73%
- 6M
- -1.67%
- 1Y
- -4.09%
- 3Y*
- 9.62%
- 5Y*
- 4.08%
- 10Y*
- 13.89%
RS
- 1D
- 1.80%
- 1M
- 9.94%
- YTD
- 40.72%
- 6M
- 37.56%
- 1Y
- 33.33%
- 3Y*
- 17.83%
- 5Y*
- 23.68%
- 10Y*
- 20.79%
SHW vs. RS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SHW The Sherwin-Williams Company | -1.73% | -3.83% | 9.90% | 32.73% | -31.96% | 44.90% | 27.05% | 49.70% | -3.23% | 54.11% |
RS Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. | 40.72% | 9.12% | -2.33% | 40.29% | 27.08% | 37.84% | 2.42% | 72.21% | -15.12% | 10.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between SHW and RS is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 1994 | 0.34 |
The correlation between SHW and RS shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (all time) to 0.45 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
SHW:
$10.42
RS:
$14.01
SHW:
30.41
RS:
28.80
SHW:
3.30
RS:
1.49
SHW:
$23.94B
RS:
$14.29B
SHW:
$11.76B
RS:
$3.90B
SHW:
$4.29B
RS:
$1.30B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SHW vs. RS — Risk / Return Rank
SHW
RS
SHW vs. RS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW) and Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. (RS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SHW | RS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.25 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.19 | 1.50 | -1.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.39 | 2.59 | -2.98 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SHW vs. RS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SHW drawdown since its inception was -52.02%, smaller than the maximum RS drawdown of -83.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHW and RS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SHW | RS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.02% | -83.80% | +31.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.36% | -22.30% | +0.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.69% | -22.30% | -3.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.46% | -22.32% | -20.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.46% | -40.83% | -1.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.63% | -2.40% | -17.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.63% | -16.47% | +4.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.42% | 12.90% | -2.48% |
Volatility
SHW vs. RS - Volatility Comparison
The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW) has a higher volatility of 8.71% compared to Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. (RS) at 7.26%. This indicates that SHW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SHW | RS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.71% | 7.26% | +1.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.62% | 17.43% | +2.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.11% | 25.70% | -0.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.32% | 27.87% | -1.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.62% | 29.69% | -3.07% |
Dividends
SHW vs. RS - Dividend Comparison
SHW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, less than RS's 1.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RS Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. | 1.21% | 1.66% | 1.63% | 1.43% | 1.73% | 1.70% | 2.09% | 1.84% | 2.81% | 2.10% | 2.07% | 2.76% |
SHW The Sherwin-Williams Company | 1.00% | 0.98% | 0.84% | 0.78% | 1.01% | 0.62% | 0.73% | 0.77% | 0.87% | 0.83% | 1.25% | 1.03% |
Financials
SHW vs. RS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Sherwin-Williams Company and Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SHW vs. RS - Profitability Comparison
SHW - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Sherwin-Williams Company reported a gross profit of 2.78B and revenue of 5.67B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.1%.
RS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. reported a gross profit of 885.40M and revenue of 3.50B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.3%.
SHW - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Sherwin-Williams Company reported an operating income of 810.90M and revenue of 5.67B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.3%.
RS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. reported an operating income of 176.20M and revenue of 3.50B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.0%.
SHW - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Sherwin-Williams Company reported a net income of 534.70M and revenue of 5.67B, resulting in a net margin of 9.4%.
RS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. reported a net income of 116.50M and revenue of 3.50B, resulting in a net margin of 3.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SHW and RS have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SHW has higher volatility (8.71%) compared to RS (7.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHW dropped -52.02% vs RS's -83.80%.
RS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs -0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SHW and RS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer