SHW vs. RS
Compare and contrast key facts about The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW) and Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. (RS).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SHW or RS.
Correlation
The correlation between SHW and RS is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
SHW vs. RS - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
SHW:
0.74
RS:
0.01
SHW:
1.16
RS:
0.26
SHW:
1.15
RS:
1.03
SHW:
0.91
RS:
0.02
SHW:
2.06
RS:
0.03
SHW:
7.68%
RS:
12.54%
SHW:
21.46%
RS:
29.12%
SHW:
-52.03%
RS:
-83.80%
SHW:
-14.53%
RS:
-17.41%
Fundamentals
SHW:
$86.04B
RS:
$15.03B
SHW:
$10.05
RS:
$18.27
SHW:
33.99
RS:
15.20
SHW:
3.14
RS:
1.20
SHW:
$17.80B
RS:
$10.71B
SHW:
$8.62B
RS:
$3.09B
SHW:
$3.56B
RS:
$1.21B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SHW achieves a 0.50% return, which is significantly lower than RS's 3.16% return. Over the past 10 years, SHW has underperformed RS with an annualized return of 15.23%, while RS has yielded a comparatively higher 20.52% annualized return.
SHW
0.50%
-6.27%
5.07%
13.88%
12.92%
15.23%
RS
3.16%
-4.93%
-9.04%
-0.06%
20.33%
20.52%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SHW vs. RS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
SHW
RS
SHW vs. RS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW) and Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. (RS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SHW vs. RS - Dividend Comparison
SHW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%, less than RS's 1.58% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SHW The Sherwin-Williams Company | 0.84% | 0.84% | 0.78% | 1.01% | 0.62% | 0.73% | 0.77% | 0.87% | 0.83% | 1.25% | 1.03% | 0.84% |
RS Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. | 1.58% | 1.63% | 1.43% | 1.73% | 1.70% | 2.09% | 1.84% | 2.81% | 2.10% | 2.07% | 2.76% | 2.28% |
Drawdowns
SHW vs. RS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SHW drawdown since its inception was -52.03%, smaller than the maximum RS drawdown of -83.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHW and RS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SHW vs. RS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW) is 6.46%, while Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. (RS) has a volatility of 7.82%. This indicates that SHW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
SHW vs. RS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Sherwin-Williams Company and Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities