SHW vs. RS

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW) and Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. (RS).

Performance

SHW vs. RS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW) and Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. (RS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

SHW vs. RS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SHW The Sherwin-Williams Company	0.74%	-3.83%	9.90%	32.73%	-31.96%	44.90%	27.05%	49.70%	-3.23%	54.11%
RS Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co.	6.77%	9.12%	-2.33%	40.29%	27.08%	37.84%	2.42%	72.21%	-15.12%	10.49%

Fundamentals

Market Cap SHW : $81.03B RS : $16.09B
EPS SHW : $10.28 RS : $14.01
PE Ratio SHW : 31.69 RS : 21.93
PS Ratio SHW : 3.45 RS : 1.13
PB Ratio SHW : 17.62 RS : 2.24
Total Revenue (TTM) SHW : $23.59B RS : $14.29B
Gross Profit (TTM) SHW : $11.53B RS : $3.01B
EBITDA (TTM) SHW : $4.30B RS : $1.30B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SHW achieves a 0.74% return, which is significantly lower than RS's 6.77% return. Over the past 10 years, SHW has underperformed RS with an annualized return of 14.05%, while RS has yielded a comparatively higher 18.20% annualized return.

SHW

• 1D: 1.61%
• 1M: -8.54%
• YTD: 0.74%
• 6M: -4.11%
• 1Y: -6.26%
• 3Y*: 14.17%
• 5Y*: 6.39%
• 10Y*: 14.05%

RS

• 1D: 1.08%
• 1M: -4.47%
• YTD: 6.77%
• 6M: 9.42%
• 1Y: 8.08%
• 3Y*: 7.84%
• 5Y*: 16.45%
• 10Y*: 18.20%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

SHW vs. RS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SHW

SHW Risk / Return Rank: 28
SHW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
SHW Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
SHW Omega Ratio Rank: 25
SHW Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
SHW Martin Ratio Rank: 28

RS

RS Risk / Return Rank: 48
RS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
RS Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
RS Omega Ratio Rank: 45
RS Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
RS Martin Ratio Rank: 49

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SHW vs. RS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW) and Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. (RS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SHW	RS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.25	0.31	-0.56
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.20	0.58	-0.78
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.98	1.08	-0.11
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.31	0.37	-0.68
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.74	0.64	-1.38
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SHW vs. RS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SHW Sharpe Ratio is -0.25, which is lower than the RS Sharpe Ratio of 0.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SHW and RS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SHW	RS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.25	0.31	-0.56
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.25	0.59	-0.34
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.54	0.62	-0.08
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.55	0.44	+0.12

Correlation

The correlation between SHW and RS is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

SHW vs. RS - Dividend Comparison

SHW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, less than RS's 1.58% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SHW The Sherwin-Williams Company	0.97%	0.98%	0.84%	0.78%	1.01%	0.62%	0.73%	0.77%	0.87%	0.83%	1.25%	1.03%
RS Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co.	1.58%	1.66%	1.63%	1.43%	1.73%	1.70%	2.09%	1.84%	2.81%	2.10%	2.07%	2.76%

Drawdowns

SHW vs. RS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SHW drawdown since its inception was -52.02%, smaller than the maximum RS drawdown of -83.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHW and RS.

Drawdown Indicators

	SHW	RS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-52.02%	-83.80%	+31.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.74%	-22.30%	+3.56%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-42.46%	-22.32%	-20.14%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.46%	-40.83%	-1.63%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-17.61%	-14.41%	-3.20%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.59%	-16.56%	+4.97%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.02%	12.75%	-4.73%

Volatility

SHW vs. RS - Volatility Comparison

The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW) has a higher volatility of 8.12% compared to Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. (RS) at 6.11%. This indicates that SHW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SHW	RS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.12%	6.11%	+2.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.56%	15.77%	+0.79%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.11%	26.23%	-1.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.75%	27.94%	-2.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.27%	29.58%	-3.31%

Financials

SHW vs. RS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between The Sherwin-Williams Company and Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

SHW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, The Sherwin-Williams Company reported a gross profit of 2.73B and revenue of 5.61B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.6%.

RS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 3.50B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

SHW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, The Sherwin-Williams Company reported an operating income of 775.80M and revenue of 5.61B, resulting in an operating margin of 13.8%.

RS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. reported an operating income of 166.30M and revenue of 3.50B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.8%.

SHW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, The Sherwin-Williams Company reported a net income of 476.80M and revenue of 5.61B, resulting in a net margin of 8.5%.

RS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. reported a net income of 116.50M and revenue of 3.50B, resulting in a net margin of 3.3%.