SHW vs. VMC
SHW (The Sherwin-Williams Company) and VMC (Vulcan Materials Company) are both stocks. Both are in the Basic Materials sector — SHW in Specialty Chemicals, VMC in Building Materials. Over the past 10 years, SHW returned 14.02%/yr vs 9.64%/yr for VMC. Their 0.39 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
SHW vs. VMC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SHW achieves a 5.70% return, which is significantly higher than VMC's -5.47% return. Over the past 10 years, SHW has outperformed VMC with an annualized return of 14.02%, while VMC has yielded a comparatively lower 9.64% annualized return.
SHW
- 1D
- -1.16%
- 1M
- -3.30%
- 6M
- -3.43%
- YTD
- 5.70%
- 1Y
- 0.18%
- 3Y*
- 7.70%
- 5Y*
- 4.14%
- 10Y*
- 14.02%
- ALL TIME*
- 15.70%
VMC
- 1D
- -0.98%
- 1M
- -11.42%
- 6M
- -10.29%
- YTD
- -5.47%
- 1Y
- -1.61%
- 3Y*
- 7.03%
- 5Y*
- 9.20%
- 10Y*
- 9.64%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.47%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $789.11M | $700.63M | $775.31M | |
| $344.84M | $306.72M | $334.39M |
SHW vs. VMC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SHW The Sherwin-Williams Company | 5.70% | -3.83% | 9.90% | 32.73% | -31.96% | 44.90% | 27.05% | 49.70% | -3.23% | 54.11% |
VMC Vulcan Materials Company | -5.47% | 11.70% | 14.12% | 30.75% | -14.87% | 41.09% | 4.15% | 47.13% | -22.28% | 3.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between SHW and VMC is 0.60, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.58 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 1988 | 0.39 |
Over the past year, SHW and VMC have become more correlated (0.60) than their long-term average of 0.39, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
SHW:
$82.74B
VMC:
$34.85B
SHW:
$10.83
VMC:
$8.49
SHW:
31.48
VMC:
31.62
SHW:
3.06
VMC:
1.97
SHW:
3.47
VMC:
4.37
SHW:
21.85
VMC:
4.15
SHW:
$24.41B
VMC:
$8.11B
SHW:
$11.98B
VMC:
$2.22B
SHW:
$4.46B
VMC:
$2.56B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SHW vs. VMC — Risk / Return Rank
SHW
VMC
SHW vs. VMC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW) and Vulcan Materials Company (VMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SHW | VMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.01 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.19 | -0.07 | +0.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.36 | -0.15 | +0.52 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SHW vs. VMC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SHW drawdown since its inception was -52.02%, smaller than the maximum VMC drawdown of -76.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHW and VMC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SHW | VMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.02% | -76.02% | +24.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.36% | -22.05% | +0.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.69% | -24.43% | -1.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.46% | -32.50% | -9.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.46% | -49.23% | +6.77% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.55% | -18.39% | +4.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.64% | -18.70% | +7.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.94% | 9.96% | +0.98% |
Volatility
SHW vs. VMC - Volatility Comparison
The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW) has a higher volatility of 11.95% compared to Vulcan Materials Company (VMC) at 9.28%. This indicates that SHW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VMC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SHW | VMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.95% | 9.28% | +2.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.80% | 22.80% | -1.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.30% | 27.24% | +0.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.85% | 26.42% | +0.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.76% | 30.46% | -3.70% |
Dividends
SHW vs. VMC - Dividend Comparison
SHW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, more than VMC's 0.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SHW The Sherwin-Williams Company | 0.93% | 0.98% | 0.84% | 0.78% | 1.01% | 0.62% | 0.73% | 0.77% | 0.87% | 0.83% | 1.25% | 1.03% |
VMC Vulcan Materials Company | 0.75% | 0.69% | 0.72% | 0.76% | 0.91% | 0.71% | 0.92% | 0.86% | 1.13% | 0.78% | 0.64% | 0.42% |
Financials
SHW vs. VMC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Sherwin-Williams Company and Vulcan Materials Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SHW vs. VMC - Profitability Comparison
SHW - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Sherwin-Williams Company reported a gross profit of 3.34B and revenue of 6.79B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.2%.
VMC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Vulcan Materials Company reported a gross profit of 625.50M and revenue of 2.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 29.0%.
SHW - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Sherwin-Williams Company reported an operating income of 1.23B and revenue of 6.79B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.1%.
VMC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Vulcan Materials Company reported an operating income of 425.30M and revenue of 2.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 19.7%.
SHW - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Sherwin-Williams Company reported a net income of 843.60M and revenue of 6.79B, resulting in a net margin of 12.4%.
VMC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Vulcan Materials Company reported a net income of 323.40M and revenue of 2.16B, resulting in a net margin of 15.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SHW and VMC have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SHW has higher volatility (11.95%) compared to VMC (9.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHW dropped -52.02% vs VMC's -76.02%.
SHW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.15 vs -0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SHW and VMC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer