BABW vs. IPDP

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BABW (Roundhill BABA WeeklyPay ETF) and IPDP (Dividend Performers ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. BABW charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.52%/yr for IPDP.

Performance

BABW vs. IPDP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill BABA WeeklyPay ETF (BABW) and Dividend Performers ETF (IPDP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

BABW

• 1D: -2.92%
• 1M: -5.34%
• YTD: -17.38%
• 6M: -24.96%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IPDP

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BABW vs. IPDP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
BABW Roundhill BABA WeeklyPay ETF	-26.57%
IPDP Dividend Performers ETF	0.00%

Return for Risk

BABW vs. IPDP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill BABA WeeklyPay ETF (BABW) and Dividend Performers ETF (IPDP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BABW	IPDP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.97	—	—

Drawdowns

BABW vs. IPDP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BABW drawdown since its inception was -40.29%, which is greater than IPDP's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BABW and IPDP.

Drawdown Indicators

	BABW	IPDP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.29%	0.00%	-40.29%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-35.94%	0.00%	-35.94%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.10%	0.00%	-22.10%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BABW	IPDP	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	49.61%	0.00%	+49.61%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	49.61%	0.00%	+49.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	49.61%	0.00%	+49.61%

BABW vs. IPDP - Expense Ratio Comparison

BABW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than IPDP's 1.52% expense ratio.

Dividends

BABW vs. IPDP - Dividend Comparison

BABW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 37.81%, while IPDP has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
BABW Roundhill BABA WeeklyPay ETF	37.81%	10.68%
IPDP Dividend Performers ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, BABW or IPDP?

On fees, BABW is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BABW or IPDP?

BABW is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.52% for IPDP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BABW or IPDP?

BABW has the higher dividend yield at 37.81%, compared with 0.00% for IPDP.

What is the main difference between BABW and IPDP?

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill Investments and Innovative Portfolios. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for BABW and 1.52% for IPDP.