IPDP vs. SPY
IPDP (Dividend Performers ETF) and SPY (State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IPDP is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Innovative Portfolios, while SPY is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. IPDP is actively managed, while SPY is passively managed. IPDP charges 1.52%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for SPY.
Performance
IPDP vs. SPY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
IPDP
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPY
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- 0.09%
- YTD
- 9.74%
- 6M
- 9.27%
- 1Y
- 26.65%
- 3Y*
- 21.27%
- 5Y*
- 13.51%
- 10Y*
- 15.70%
IPDP vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
IPDP Dividend Performers ETF | 0.00% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 10.44% |
IPDP vs. SPY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IPDP
SPY
Industrials
Financial Services
Healthcare
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Industrials
IPDP
SPY
Financial Services
IPDP
SPY
Healthcare
IPDP
SPY
Technology
IPDP
SPY
Consumer Defensive
IPDP
SPY
Consumer Cyclical
IPDP
SPY
Basic Materials
IPDP
SPY
Communication Services
IPDP
-
SPY
Energy
IPDP
-
SPY
Real Estate
IPDP
-
SPY
Utilities
IPDP
-
SPY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IPDP vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank
IPDP
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SPY
IPDP vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dividend Performers ETF (IPDP) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IPDP | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.39 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.01 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 13.54 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IPDP vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IPDP drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum SPY drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IPDP and SPY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IPDP | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -55.19% | +55.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.88% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.76% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.50% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.75% | +1.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -9.04% | +9.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.97% | — |
Volatility
IPDP vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IPDP | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.64% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.75% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00% | 12.43% | -12.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 17.14% | -17.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 17.99% | -17.99% |
IPDP vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison
IPDP has a 1.52% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
IPDP vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison
IPDP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IPDP Dividend Performers ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 1.01% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.40% | 1.65% | 1.20% | 1.52% | 1.75% | 2.04% | 1.80% | 2.03% | 2.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 1.52% for IPDP.
SPY has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.00% for IPDP.
IPDP is categorized as Derivative Income, while SPY is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Innovative Portfolios and State Street. Their fees differ too: 1.52% for IPDP and 0.09% for SPY.
Find the right allocation for IPDP and SPY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer