PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IPDP vs. QDVO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IPDP vs. QDVO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dividend Performers ETF (IPDP) and Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF (QDVO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


IPDP

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QDVO

1D
-1.31%
1M
-3.62%
YTD
5.51%
6M
4.58%
1Y
21.13%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IPDP vs. QDVO - Yearly Performance Comparison


IPDP vs. QDVO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IPDP
QDVO

Industrials

45.1%
2.9%

Financial Services

18.6%
3.8%

Healthcare

13.6%
4.9%

Technology

13.1%
50.4%

Consumer Defensive

3.9%
6.2%

Consumer Cyclical

3.6%
12.9%

Basic Materials

1.5%
2.2%

Communication Services

-

15.4%

Energy

-

0.9%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

0.4%

Industrials

IPDP
45.1%
QDVO
2.9%

Financial Services

IPDP
18.6%
QDVO
3.8%

Healthcare

IPDP
13.6%
QDVO
4.9%

Technology

IPDP
13.1%
QDVO
50.4%

Consumer Defensive

IPDP
3.9%
QDVO
6.2%

Consumer Cyclical

IPDP
3.6%
QDVO
12.9%

Basic Materials

IPDP
1.5%
QDVO
2.2%

Communication Services

IPDP

-

QDVO
15.4%

Energy

IPDP

-

QDVO
0.9%

Real Estate

IPDP

-

QDVO

-

Utilities

IPDP

-

QDVO
0.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IPDP vs. QDVO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IPDP

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


QDVO
QDVO Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
QDVO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDVO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDVO Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
QDVO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDVO Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IPDP vs. QDVO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dividend Performers ETF (IPDP) and Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF (QDVO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IPDPQDVODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.08

IPDP vs. QDVO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IPDP vs. QDVO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IPDP drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum QDVO drawdown of -17.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IPDP and QDVO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IPDPQDVODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-17.75%

+17.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-4.81%

+4.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-2.41%

+2.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.62%

Volatility

IPDP vs. QDVO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IPDPQDVODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00%

12.69%

-12.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.00%

17.54%

-17.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.00%

17.54%

-17.54%

IPDP vs. QDVO - Expense Ratio Comparison

IPDP has a 1.52% expense ratio, which is higher than QDVO's 0.56% expense ratio.


Dividends

IPDP vs. QDVO - Dividend Comparison

IPDP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QDVO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.53%.


PositionTTM20252024
IPDP
Dividend Performers ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%
QDVO
Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF
10.53%9.92%2.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, QDVO is cheaper at 0.56% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QDVO is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 1.52% for IPDP.

QDVO has the higher dividend yield at 10.53%, compared with 0.00% for IPDP.

They also come from different issuers: Innovative Portfolios and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 1.52% for IPDP and 0.56% for QDVO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IPDP and QDVO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer