PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IPDP vs. QDVO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IPDP vs. QDVO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dividend Performers ETF (IPDP) and Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF (QDVO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


IPDP

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QDVO

1D
-0.55%
1M
4.45%
YTD
9.80%
6M
9.65%
1Y
27.43%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IPDP vs. QDVO - Yearly Performance Comparison


IPDP vs. QDVO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IPDP
QDVO

Industrials

45.1%
1.7%

Financial Services

18.6%
4.1%

Healthcare

13.6%
4.6%

Technology

13.1%
50.6%

Consumer Defensive

3.9%
6.3%

Consumer Cyclical

3.6%
12.5%

Basic Materials

1.5%
1.8%

Communication Services

-

16.8%

Energy

-

0.8%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

0.7%

Industrials

IPDP
45.1%
QDVO
1.7%

Financial Services

IPDP
18.6%
QDVO
4.1%

Healthcare

IPDP
13.6%
QDVO
4.6%

Technology

IPDP
13.1%
QDVO
50.6%

Consumer Defensive

IPDP
3.9%
QDVO
6.3%

Consumer Cyclical

IPDP
3.6%
QDVO
12.5%

Basic Materials

IPDP
1.5%
QDVO
1.8%

Communication Services

IPDP

-

QDVO
16.8%

Energy

IPDP

-

QDVO
0.8%

Real Estate

IPDP

-

QDVO

-

Utilities

IPDP

-

QDVO
0.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IPDP vs. QDVO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IPDP

QDVO
QDVO Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
QDVO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDVO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDVO Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
QDVO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDVO Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IPDP vs. QDVO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dividend Performers ETF (IPDP) and Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF (QDVO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

IPDP vs. QDVO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IPDPQDVODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.41

Drawdowns

IPDP vs. QDVO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IPDP drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum QDVO drawdown of -17.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IPDP and QDVO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IPDPQDVODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-17.75%

+17.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.94%

+0.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-2.37%

+2.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.51%

Volatility

IPDP vs. QDVO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IPDPQDVODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00%

12.22%

-12.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.00%

17.44%

-17.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.00%

17.44%

-17.44%

IPDP vs. QDVO - Expense Ratio Comparison

IPDP has a 1.52% expense ratio, which is higher than QDVO's 0.56% expense ratio.


Dividends

IPDP vs. QDVO - Dividend Comparison

IPDP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QDVO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.12%.


PositionTTM20252024
IPDP
Dividend Performers ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%
QDVO
Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF
10.12%9.92%2.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, QDVO is cheaper at 0.56% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QDVO is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 1.52% for IPDP.

QDVO has the higher dividend yield at 10.12%, compared with 0.00% for IPDP.

They also come from different issuers: Innovative Portfolios and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 1.52% for IPDP and 0.56% for QDVO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IPDP and QDVO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer