BABW vs. HYGW
BABW (Roundhill BABA WeeklyPay ETF) and HYGW (iShares High Yield Corporate Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. BABW is actively managed, while HYGW is passively managed. Their 0.23 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. BABW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for HYGW.
Performance
BABW vs. HYGW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BABW achieves a -16.68% return, which is significantly lower than HYGW's 2.94% return.
BABW
- 1D
- 1.55%
- 1M
- 40.41%
- 6M
- -26.50%
- YTD
- -16.68%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
HYGW
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- 0.60%
- 6M
- 2.29%
- YTD
- 2.94%
- 1Y
- 6.30%
- 3Y*
- 5.58%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 5.81%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $110.31K | $74.82K | $59.98K | |
| $522.43K | $620.74K | $795.59K |
BABW vs. HYGW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BABW Roundhill BABA WeeklyPay ETF | -16.68% | -16.98% |
HYGW iShares High Yield Corporate Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF | 2.94% | 1.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between BABW and HYGW is 0.23, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2025 | 0.23 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BABW vs. HYGW — Risk / Return Rank
BABW
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
HYGW
BABW vs. HYGW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill BABA WeeklyPay ETF (BABW) and iShares High Yield Corporate Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF (HYGW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BABW | HYGW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.44 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.48 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 15.53 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BABW vs. HYGW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BABW drawdown since its inception was -54.76%, which is greater than HYGW's maximum drawdown of -5.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BABW and HYGW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BABW | HYGW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.76% | -5.49% | -49.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -1.82% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -3.42% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -35.40% | 0.00% | -35.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.02% | -0.59% | -26.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.41% | — |
Volatility
BABW vs. HYGW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BABW | HYGW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.88% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.35% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.46% | 2.94% | +47.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.46% | 4.61% | +45.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.46% | 4.61% | +45.85% |
BABW vs. HYGW - Expense Ratio Comparison
BABW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than HYGW's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
BABW vs. HYGW - Dividend Comparison
BABW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 45.79%, more than HYGW's 10.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BABW Roundhill BABA WeeklyPay ETF | 45.79% | 10.68% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HYGW iShares High Yield Corporate Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF | 10.35% | 12.53% | 12.30% | 15.98% | 8.71% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BABW and HYGW have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HYGW is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HYGW is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for BABW.
BABW has the higher dividend yield at 45.79%, compared with 10.35% for HYGW.
They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for BABW and 0.69% for HYGW.
Find the right allocation for BABW and HYGW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer