HYGW vs. HYG
HYGW (iShares High Yield Corporate Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF) and HYG (iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds from iShares - HYGW tracks the Cboe HYG BuyWrite Index while HYG tracks the iBoxx $ Liquid High Yield Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, HYGW returned 5.66%/yr vs 8.58%/yr for HYG. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HYGW charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for HYG.
Performance
HYGW vs. HYG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HYGW achieves a 1.75% return, which is significantly higher than HYG's 1.60% return.
HYGW
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 0.57%
- YTD
- 1.75%
- 6M
- 2.57%
- 1Y
- 6.58%
- 3Y*
- 5.66%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HYG
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- YTD
- 1.60%
- 6M
- 2.09%
- 1Y
- 7.00%
- 3Y*
- 8.58%
- 5Y*
- 3.87%
- 10Y*
- 4.97%
HYGW vs. HYG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYGW iShares High Yield Corporate Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF | 1.75% | 6.19% | 6.99% | 7.31% | -0.12% |
HYG iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 1.60% | 8.59% | 7.97% | 11.54% | -0.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between HYGW and HYG is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 23, 2022 | 0.79 |
The correlation between HYGW and HYG shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (1 year) to 0.79 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
HYGW vs. HYG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HYGW
HYG
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
HYGW
HYG
Real Estate
HYGW
HYG
Basic Materials
HYGW
-
HYG
-
Communication Services
HYGW
-
HYG
-
Consumer Cyclical
HYGW
-
HYG
-
Consumer Defensive
HYGW
-
HYG
-
Energy
HYGW
-
HYG
-
Financial Services
HYGW
-
HYG
-
Healthcare
HYGW
-
HYG
-
Industrials
HYGW
-
HYG
-
Technology
HYGW
-
HYG
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HYGW vs. HYG — Risk / Return Rank
HYGW
HYG
HYGW vs. HYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares High Yield Corporate Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF (HYGW) and iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HYGW | HYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.36 | 1.85 | +0.50 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.47 | 2.80 | +0.67 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.36 | +0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.76 | 2.99 | +0.77 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.24 | 13.22 | +4.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HYGW | HYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.36 | 1.85 | +0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.52 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.60 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.25 | 0.46 | +0.80 |
Drawdowns
HYGW vs. HYG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HYGW drawdown since its inception was -5.49%, smaller than the maximum HYG drawdown of -34.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYGW and HYG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HYGW | HYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.49% | -34.25% | +28.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.82% | -2.34% | +0.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.66% | -4.56% | +0.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -15.79% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -22.03% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.10% | -0.00% | -0.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.61% | -3.24% | +2.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.40% | 0.53% | -0.13% |
Volatility
HYGW vs. HYG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares High Yield Corporate Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF (HYGW) is 0.90%, while iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG) has a volatility of 1.22%. This indicates that HYGW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HYGW | HYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.90% | 1.22% | -0.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.21% | 3.00% | -0.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.81% | 3.79% | -0.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.68% | 7.52% | -2.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.68% | 8.29% | -3.61% |
HYGW vs. HYG - Expense Ratio Comparison
HYGW has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than HYG's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
HYGW vs. HYG - Dividend Comparison
HYGW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.89%, more than HYG's 5.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYG iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 5.90% | 5.71% | 6.01% | 5.74% | 5.30% | 4.02% | 4.88% | 4.99% | 5.54% | 5.12% | 5.27% | 5.90% |
HYGW iShares High Yield Corporate Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF | 11.56% | 12.53% | 12.30% | 15.98% | 8.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HYGW and HYG have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HYG has higher volatility (1.22%) compared to HYGW (0.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYGW dropped -5.49% vs HYG's -34.25%.
On 3-year performance, HYG leads with 8.58% vs 5.66% for HYGW. On fees, HYG is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, HYGW has been the lower-risk option at 0.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, HYG has performed better with a 8.58% return vs 5.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HYG is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for HYGW.
HYGW has the higher dividend yield at 12.89%, compared with 5.90% for HYG.
HYGW tracks Cboe HYG BuyWrite Index, while HYG tracks iBoxx $ Liquid High Yield Index. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for HYGW and 0.49% for HYG.
HYGW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HYGW and HYG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer