PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HYGW vs. HYG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HYGW vs. HYG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares High Yield Corporate Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF (HYGW) and iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYGW achieves a 2.68% return, which is significantly higher than HYG's 1.81% return.


HYGW

1D
0.31%
1M
0.35%
6M
2.13%
YTD
2.68%
1Y
6.23%
3Y*
5.49%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
5.75%

HYG

1D
0.27%
1M
-0.02%
6M
1.13%
YTD
1.81%
1Y
5.12%
3Y*
8.25%
5Y*
3.73%
10Y*
4.64%
ALL TIME*
4.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.88B$2.52B$2.69B
$507.28K$613.90K$793.25K

HYGW vs. HYG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
HYGW
iShares High Yield Corporate Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF
2.68%6.19%6.99%7.31%-0.39%
HYG
iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
1.81%8.59%7.97%11.54%-2.07%

Correlation

The correlation between HYGW and HYG is 0.76, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2022

0.80

The correlation between HYGW and HYG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HYGW vs. HYG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

HYGW
HYGW Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
HYGW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYGW Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYGW Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
HYGW Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYGW Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

HYG
HYG Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
HYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYG Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
HYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYG Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HYGW vs. HYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares High Yield Corporate Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF (HYGW) and iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HYGWHYGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.25

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.44

2.20

+1.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.37

9.47

+5.90

HYGW vs. HYG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYGW Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is higher than the HYG Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYGW and HYG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HYGW vs. HYG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYGW drawdown since its inception was -5.49%, smaller than the maximum HYG drawdown of -34.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYGW and HYG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HYGWHYGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.49%

-34.25%

+28.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.82%

-2.34%

+0.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.42%

-4.56%

+1.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.22%

+0.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.59%

-3.22%

+2.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.41%

0.54%

-0.13%

Volatility

HYGW vs. HYG - Volatility Comparison

iShares High Yield Corporate Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF (HYGW) and iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG) have volatilities of 0.86% and 0.83%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HYGWHYGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.86%

0.83%

+0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.34%

3.17%

-0.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.94%

3.87%

-0.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.62%

7.53%

-2.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.62%

8.21%

-3.59%

HYGW vs. HYG - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYGW has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than HYG's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

HYGW vs. HYG - Dividend Comparison

HYGW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.67%, more than HYG's 5.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HYG
iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
5.91%5.71%6.01%5.74%5.30%4.02%4.88%4.99%5.54%5.12%5.27%5.90%
HYGW
iShares High Yield Corporate Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF
10.67%12.53%12.30%15.98%8.71%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HYGW and HYG have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HYGW has higher volatility (0.86%) compared to HYG (0.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYGW dropped -5.49% vs HYG's -34.25%.

On 3-year performance, HYG leads with 8.25% vs 5.49% for HYGW. On fees, HYG is cheaper at 0.49% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, HYG has performed better with a 8.25% return vs 5.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HYG is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for HYGW.

HYGW has the higher dividend yield at 10.67%, compared with 5.91% for HYG.

HYGW is categorized as Derivative Income, while HYG is High Yield Bonds. HYGW tracks Cboe HYG BuyWrite Index, while HYG tracks Markit iBoxx USD Liquid High Yield Index. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for HYGW and 0.49% for HYG.

HYGW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HYGW and HYG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer