PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HYGW vs. TIME
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HYGW vs. TIME - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares High Yield Corporate Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF (HYGW) and Clockwise Core Equity & Innovation ETF (TIME). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYGW achieves a 2.25% return, which is significantly lower than TIME's 6.28% return.


HYGW

1D
0.00%
1M
0.82%
YTD
2.25%
6M
2.52%
1Y
6.59%
3Y*
5.93%
5Y*
10Y*

TIME

1D
-1.44%
1M
-2.34%
YTD
6.28%
6M
5.78%
1Y
18.44%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYGW vs. TIME - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between HYGW and TIME is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2024

0.52

The correlation between HYGW and TIME has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HYGW vs. TIME — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYGW
HYGW Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
HYGW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYGW Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYGW Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
HYGW Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYGW Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

TIME
TIME Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
TIME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TIME Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
TIME Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
TIME Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
TIME Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYGW vs. TIME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares High Yield Corporate Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF (HYGW) and Clockwise Core Equity & Innovation ETF (TIME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HYGWTIMEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.23

+0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.64

1.41

+2.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.58

5.10

+11.48

HYGW vs. TIME - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYGW Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is higher than the TIME Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYGW and TIME, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HYGW vs. TIME - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYGW drawdown since its inception was -5.49%, smaller than the maximum TIME drawdown of -24.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYGW and TIME.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HYGWTIMEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.49%

-24.26%

+18.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.82%

-13.09%

+11.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-3.94%

+3.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.60%

-5.53%

+4.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.40%

3.63%

-3.23%

Volatility

HYGW vs. TIME - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares High Yield Corporate Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF (HYGW) is 0.77%, while Clockwise Core Equity & Innovation ETF (TIME) has a volatility of 5.23%. This indicates that HYGW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TIME based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HYGWTIMEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.77%

5.23%

-4.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.23%

11.10%

-8.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.86%

13.98%

-11.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.66%

17.73%

-13.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.66%

17.73%

-13.07%

HYGW vs. TIME - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYGW has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than TIME's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

HYGW vs. TIME - Dividend Comparison

HYGW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.50%, more than TIME's 9.43% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
HYGW
iShares High Yield Corporate Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF
11.50%12.53%12.30%15.98%8.71%
TIME
Clockwise Core Equity & Innovation ETF
9.43%10.02%15.84%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HYGW and TIME have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TIME has higher volatility (5.23%) compared to HYGW (0.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYGW dropped -5.49% vs TIME's -24.26%.

On 1-year performance, TIME leads with 18.44% vs 6.59% for HYGW. On fees, HYGW is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, HYGW has been the lower-risk option at 0.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TIME has performed better with a 18.44% return vs 6.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HYGW is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for TIME.

HYGW has the higher dividend yield at 11.50%, compared with 9.43% for TIME.

HYGW is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while TIME is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Clockwise Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for HYGW and 1.00% for TIME.

HYGW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HYGW and TIME

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer