BABW vs. BABA

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

BABW (Roundhill BABA WeeklyPay ETF) is Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill Investments, while BABA (Alibaba Group Holding Limited) is a stock. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep.

Performance

BABW vs. BABA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill BABA WeeklyPay ETF (BABW) and Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BABW achieves a -24.84% return, which is significantly lower than BABA's -18.97% return.

BABW

• 1D: 5.64%
• 1M: 4.89%
• 6M: -36.95%
• YTD: -24.84%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BABA

• 1D: 4.78%
• 1M: 4.57%
• 6M: -30.09%
• YTD: -18.97%
• 1Y: 1.54%
• 3Y*: 9.77%
• 5Y*: -10.03%
• 10Y*: 4.41%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BABW vs. BABA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BABW Roundhill BABA WeeklyPay ETF	-24.84%	-16.98%
BABA Alibaba Group Holding Limited	-18.97%	-11.62%

Correlation

The correlation between BABW and BABA is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2025	0.99

Return for Risk

BABW vs. BABA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BABW

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BABA

BABA Risk / Return Rank: 45
BABA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
BABA Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
BABA Omega Ratio Rank: 43
BABA Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
BABA Martin Ratio Rank: 46

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BABW vs. BABA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill BABA WeeklyPay ETF (BABW) and Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BABW	BABA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	0.03	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	0.42	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.04	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	0.03	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	0.07	—

Drawdowns

BABW vs. BABA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BABW drawdown since its inception was -54.76%, smaller than the maximum BABA drawdown of -80.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BABW and BABA.

Drawdown Indicators

	BABW	BABA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.76%	-80.09%	+25.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-49.47%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-49.47%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-70.50%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-80.09%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-41.73%	-60.57%	+18.84%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-25.89%	-37.75%	+11.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	23.37%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BABW	BABA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	14.53%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	29.04%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	50.61%	45.28%	+5.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	50.61%	51.69%	-1.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	50.61%	43.58%	+7.03%

Dividends

BABW vs. BABA - Dividend Comparison

BABW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 46.60%, more than BABA's 0.89% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BABA Alibaba Group Holding Limited	0.89%	1.36%	1.96%	1.29%
BABW Roundhill BABA WeeklyPay ETF	46.60%	10.68%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BABW and BABA in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.99, BABW and BABA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.