BABA vs. BIDU
BABA (Alibaba Group Holding Limited) and BIDU (Baidu, Inc.) are both stocks. BABA operates in Internet Retail (Consumer Cyclical), while BIDU operates in Internet Content & Information (Communication Services). Over the past 10 years, BABA returned 4.81%/yr vs -3.85%/yr for BIDU. Their 0.66 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently.
Performance
BABA vs. BIDU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BABA achieves a -12.36% return, which is significantly higher than BIDU's -13.47% return. Over the past 10 years, BABA has outperformed BIDU with an annualized return of 4.81%, while BIDU has yielded a comparatively lower -3.85% annualized return.
BABA
- 1D
- 4.13%
- 1M
- 32.41%
- 6M
- -23.71%
- YTD
- -12.36%
- 1Y
- 9.74%
- 3Y*
- 11.76%
- 5Y*
- -7.59%
- 10Y*
- 4.81%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.23%
BIDU
- 1D
- 1.76%
- 1M
- -0.21%
- 6M
- -23.90%
- YTD
- -13.47%
- 1Y
- 31.27%
- 3Y*
- -8.64%
- 5Y*
- -7.15%
- 10Y*
- -3.85%
- ALL TIME*
- 14.49%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.14B | $1.40B | $1.53B | |
BIDU Baidu, Inc. | $195.85M | $233.21M | $317.03M |
BABA vs. BIDU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BABA Alibaba Group Holding Limited | -12.36% | 75.80% | 11.77% | -10.83% | -25.84% | -48.96% | 9.73% | 54.74% | -20.51% | 96.37% |
BIDU Baidu, Inc. | -13.47% | 54.98% | -29.20% | 4.12% | -23.13% | -31.19% | 71.08% | -20.30% | -32.28% | 42.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between BABA and BIDU is 0.66, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.70 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.74 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2014 | 0.66 |
The correlation between BABA and BIDU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
BABA:
$305.01B
BIDU:
$38.45B
BABA:
CN¥33.85
BIDU:
CN¥3.78
BABA:
25.36
BIDU:
201.85
BABA:
1.14
BIDU:
9.17
BABA:
2.55
BIDU:
2.04
BABA:
1.96
BIDU:
0.98
BABA:
CN¥811.51B
BIDU:
CN¥128.51B
BABA:
CN¥332.88B
BIDU:
CN¥54.09B
BABA:
CN¥112.44B
BIDU:
CN¥23.17B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BABA vs. BIDU — Risk / Return Rank
BABA
BIDU
BABA vs. BIDU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) and Baidu, Inc. (BIDU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BABA | BIDU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.15 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.20 | 0.87 | -0.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.39 | 1.59 | -1.20 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BABA vs. BIDU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BABA drawdown since its inception was -80.09%, roughly equal to the maximum BIDU drawdown of -77.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BABA and BIDU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BABA | BIDU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.09% | -77.47% | -2.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -49.47% | -36.01% | -13.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -49.47% | -48.16% | -1.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -68.31% | -57.69% | -10.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -80.09% | -77.47% | -2.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -57.35% | -66.74% | +9.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.85% | -35.77% | -2.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.87% | 19.70% | +5.17% |
Volatility
BABA vs. BIDU - Volatility Comparison
Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) has a higher volatility of 14.11% compared to Baidu, Inc. (BIDU) at 10.85%. This indicates that BABA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIDU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BABA | BIDU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.11% | 10.85% | +3.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.32% | 33.19% | -3.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 45.19% | 50.71% | -5.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.64% | 51.98% | -0.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.67% | 46.45% | -2.78% |
Dividends
BABA vs. BIDU - Dividend Comparison
BABA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, while BIDU has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BABA Alibaba Group Holding Limited | 0.82% | 1.36% | 1.96% | 1.29% |
BIDU Baidu, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
BABA vs. BIDU - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Alibaba Group Holding Limited and Baidu, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BABA vs. BIDU - Profitability Comparison
BABA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Alibaba Group Holding Limited reported a gross profit of 11.75B and revenue of 35.15B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.4%.
BIDU - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Baidu, Inc. reported a gross profit of 12.41B and revenue of 31.88B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.9%.
BABA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Alibaba Group Holding Limited reported an operating income of -135.47M and revenue of 35.15B, resulting in an operating margin of -0.4%.
BIDU - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Baidu, Inc. reported an operating income of 3.17B and revenue of 31.88B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.0%.
BABA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Alibaba Group Holding Limited reported a net income of 3.69B and revenue of 35.15B, resulting in a net margin of 10.5%.
BIDU - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Baidu, Inc. reported a net income of 3.42B and revenue of 31.88B, resulting in a net margin of 10.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BABA and BIDU have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BABA has higher volatility (14.11%) compared to BIDU (10.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BABA dropped -80.09% vs BIDU's -77.47%.
BIDU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.62 vs 0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BABA and BIDU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer