BABA vs. AAPL

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) and Apple Inc (AAPL).

Performance

BABA vs. AAPL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) and Apple Inc (AAPL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BABA vs. AAPL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BABA Alibaba Group Holding Limited	-14.41%	75.80%	11.77%	-10.83%	-25.84%	-48.96%	9.73%	54.74%	-20.51%	96.37%
AAPL Apple Inc	-6.56%	9.05%	30.71%	49.01%	-26.40%	34.65%	82.31%	88.96%	-5.39%	48.46%

Fundamentals

Market Cap BABA : $302.83B AAPL : $3.76T
EPS BABA : $37.64 AAPL : $7.89
PE Ratio BABA : 3.33 AAPL : 32.15
PEG Ratio BABA : 0.26 AAPL : 4.23
PS Ratio BABA : 0.30 AAPL : 8.69
PB Ratio BABA : 0.29 AAPL : 42.62
Total Revenue (TTM) BABA : $1.01T AAPL : $435.62B
Gross Profit (TTM) BABA : $411.95B AAPL : $206.16B
EBITDA (TTM) BABA : $132.37B AAPL : $150.07B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BABA achieves a -14.41% return, which is significantly lower than AAPL's -6.56% return. Over the past 10 years, BABA has underperformed AAPL with an annualized return of 5.31%, while AAPL has yielded a comparatively higher 26.13% annualized return.

BABA

• 1D: 2.85%
• 1M: -12.94%
• YTD: -14.41%
• 6M: -29.80%
• 1Y: -3.52%
• 3Y*: 8.94%
• 5Y*: -10.05%
• 10Y*: 5.31%

AAPL

• 1D: 2.90%
• 1M: -3.93%
• YTD: -6.56%
• 6M: -0.14%
• 1Y: 14.75%
• 3Y*: 16.01%
• 5Y*: 16.20%
• 10Y*: 26.13%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

BABA vs. AAPL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BABA

BABA Risk / Return Rank: 38
BABA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
BABA Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
BABA Omega Ratio Rank: 36
BABA Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
BABA Martin Ratio Rank: 38

AAPL

AAPL Risk / Return Rank: 59
AAPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
AAPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
AAPL Omega Ratio Rank: 56
AAPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
AAPL Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BABA vs. AAPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) and Apple Inc (AAPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BABA	AAPL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.08	0.47	-0.55
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.23	0.92	-0.69
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.03	1.13	-0.10
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.10	0.74	-0.84
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.24	2.30	-2.54
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BABA vs. AAPL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BABA Sharpe Ratio is -0.08, which is lower than the AAPL Sharpe Ratio of 0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BABA and AAPL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BABA	AAPL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.08	0.47	-0.55
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.20	0.59	-0.79
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.12	0.91	-0.78
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.07	0.43	-0.36

Correlation

The correlation between BABA and AAPL is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

BABA vs. AAPL - Dividend Comparison

BABA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.59%, more than AAPL's 0.41% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BABA Alibaba Group Holding Limited	1.59%	1.36%	1.96%	1.29%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
AAPL Apple Inc	0.41%	0.38%	0.40%	0.49%	0.70%	0.49%	0.61%	1.04%	1.79%	1.45%	1.93%	1.93%

Drawdowns

BABA vs. AAPL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BABA drawdown since its inception was -80.09%, roughly equal to the maximum AAPL drawdown of -81.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BABA and AAPL.

Drawdown Indicators

	BABA	AAPL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-80.09%	-81.80%	+1.71%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-35.58%	-22.99%	-12.59%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-74.12%	-33.36%	-40.76%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-80.09%	-38.52%	-41.57%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-58.34%	-11.24%	-47.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-37.23%	-29.71%	-7.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	15.43%	7.38%	+8.05%

Volatility

BABA vs. AAPL - Volatility Comparison

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) has a higher volatility of 12.47% compared to Apple Inc (AAPL) at 5.58%. This indicates that BABA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BABA	AAPL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.47%	5.58%	+6.89%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	29.36%	15.09%	+14.27%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	45.97%	31.66%	+14.31%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	51.12%	27.46%	+23.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	43.22%	28.94%	+14.28%

Financials

BABA vs. AAPL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Alibaba Group Holding Limited and Apple Inc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

BABA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Alibaba Group Holding Limited reported a gross profit of 112.89B and revenue of 280.91B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.2%.

AAPL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Apple Inc reported a gross profit of 69.23B and revenue of 143.76B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.2%.

BABA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Alibaba Group Holding Limited reported an operating income of 18.44B and revenue of 280.91B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.6%.

AAPL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Apple Inc reported an operating income of 50.85B and revenue of 143.76B, resulting in an operating margin of 35.4%.

BABA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Alibaba Group Holding Limited reported a net income of 16.16B and revenue of 280.91B, resulting in a net margin of 5.8%.

AAPL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Apple Inc reported a net income of 42.10B and revenue of 143.76B, resulting in a net margin of 29.3%.