AUMI vs. BOTT

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Themes Gold Miners ETF (AUMI) and Themes Robotics & Automation ETF (BOTT).

AUMI and BOTT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AUMI is a passively managed fund by Themes that tracks the performance of the Solactive Global Pure Gold Miners Index. It was launched on Dec 12, 2023. BOTT is a passively managed fund by Themes that tracks the performance of the Solactive Industrial Robotics & Automation Index - Benchmark TR Net. It was launched on Apr 19, 2024. Both AUMI and BOTT are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

AUMI vs. BOTT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Themes Gold Miners ETF (AUMI) and Themes Robotics & Automation ETF (BOTT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

AUMI vs. BOTT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
AUMI Themes Gold Miners ETF	10.53%	164.18%	17.60%
BOTT Themes Robotics & Automation ETF	10.26%	55.56%	10.74%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with AUMI having a 10.53% return and BOTT slightly lower at 10.26%.

AUMI

• 1D: 5.17%
• 1M: -16.46%
• YTD: 10.53%
• 6M: 26.21%
• 1Y: 116.15%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BOTT

• 1D: 2.27%
• 1M: -18.08%
• YTD: 10.26%
• 6M: 16.43%
• 1Y: 83.87%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AUMI vs. BOTT - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both AUMI and BOTT have an expense ratio of 0.35%.

AUMI

Themes Gold Miners ETF

BOTT

Themes Robotics & Automation ETF

Return for Risk

AUMI vs. BOTT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AUMI

AUMI Risk / Return Rank: 91
AUMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
AUMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
AUMI Omega Ratio Rank: 87
AUMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
AUMI Martin Ratio Rank: 91

BOTT

BOTT Risk / Return Rank: 88
BOTT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
BOTT Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
BOTT Omega Ratio Rank: 88
BOTT Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
BOTT Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AUMI vs. BOTT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Themes Gold Miners ETF (AUMI) and Themes Robotics & Automation ETF (BOTT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AUMI	BOTT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.35	2.24	+0.11
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.57	2.82	-0.25
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.38	-0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.66	2.72	+0.94
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	12.93	9.46	+3.48
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AUMI vs. BOTT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AUMI Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is comparable to the BOTT Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AUMI and BOTT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AUMI	BOTT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.35	2.24	+0.11
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.01	1.21	+0.80

Correlation

The correlation between AUMI and BOTT is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

AUMI vs. BOTT - Dividend Comparison

AUMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%, more than BOTT's 0.12% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024
AUMI Themes Gold Miners ETF	0.78%	0.86%	1.84%
BOTT Themes Robotics & Automation ETF	0.12%	0.14%	1.74%

Drawdowns

AUMI vs. BOTT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AUMI drawdown since its inception was -31.88%, roughly equal to the maximum BOTT drawdown of -30.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AUMI and BOTT.

Drawdown Indicators

	AUMI	BOTT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.88%	-30.74%	-1.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-31.88%	-30.74%	-1.14%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-16.84%	-26.20%	+9.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.00%	-5.81%	-0.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.03%	8.84%	+0.19%

Volatility

AUMI vs. BOTT - Volatility Comparison

Themes Gold Miners ETF (AUMI) has a higher volatility of 18.77% compared to Themes Robotics & Automation ETF (BOTT) at 11.91%. This indicates that AUMI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BOTT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AUMI	BOTT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	18.77%	11.91%	+6.86%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	40.65%	30.52%	+10.13%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	49.65%	37.67%	+11.98%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	41.38%	32.68%	+8.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	41.38%	32.68%	+8.70%