PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AUMI vs. MSTY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AUMI vs. MSTY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Themes Gold Miners ETF (AUMI) and YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (MSTY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AUMI achieves a -3.13% return, which is significantly higher than MSTY's -8.55% return.


AUMI

1D
1.05%
1M
-2.87%
YTD
-3.13%
6M
2.96%
1Y
51.93%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MSTY

1D
-8.50%
1M
-20.82%
YTD
-8.55%
6M
-19.25%
1Y
-57.30%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AUMI vs. MSTY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
AUMI
Themes Gold Miners ETF
-3.13%164.18%48.17%
MSTY
YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF
-8.55%-42.71%200.20%

Correlation

The correlation between AUMI and MSTY is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 2024

0.18

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AUMI vs. MSTY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AUMI
AUMI Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
AUMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AUMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
AUMI Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
AUMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
AUMI Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

MSTY
MSTY Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
MSTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSTY Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
MSTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSTY Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AUMI vs. MSTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Themes Gold Miners ETF (AUMI) and YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (MSTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AUMIMSTYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.09

-0.96

+2.05

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.54

-1.53

+3.08

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

0.83

+0.38

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.97

-0.79

+2.76

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.11

-1.22

+6.32

AUMI vs. MSTY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AUMI Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is higher than the MSTY Sharpe Ratio of -0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AUMI and MSTY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AUMIMSTYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.09

-0.96

+2.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.60

0.31

+1.29

Drawdowns

AUMI vs. MSTY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AUMI drawdown since its inception was -31.88%, smaller than the maximum MSTY drawdown of -71.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AUMI and MSTY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AUMIMSTYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.88%

-71.79%

+39.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.88%

-71.79%

+39.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-27.12%

-64.04%

+36.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.02%

-26.01%

+18.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.32%

46.68%

-34.36%

Volatility

AUMI vs. MSTY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Themes Gold Miners ETF (AUMI) is 14.29%, while YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (MSTY) has a volatility of 16.65%. This indicates that AUMI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AUMIMSTYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.29%

16.65%

-2.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

38.44%

48.38%

-9.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

48.37%

60.11%

-11.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

41.56%

71.83%

-30.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.56%

71.83%

-30.27%

AUMI vs. MSTY - Expense Ratio Comparison

AUMI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than MSTY's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

AUMI vs. MSTY - Dividend Comparison

AUMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, less than MSTY's 251.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
AUMI
Themes Gold Miners ETF
0.89%0.86%1.84%
MSTY
YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF
251.24%294.61%104.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


AUMI and MSTY have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MSTY has higher volatility (16.65%) compared to AUMI (14.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AUMI dropped -31.88% vs MSTY's -71.79%.

On 1-year performance, AUMI leads with 51.93% vs -57.30% for MSTY. On fees, AUMI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, AUMI has been the lower-risk option at 14.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AUMI has performed better with a 51.93% return vs -57.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AUMI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for MSTY.

MSTY has the higher dividend yield at 251.24%, compared with 0.89% for AUMI.

AUMI is categorized as Gold, while MSTY is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Themes and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for AUMI and 0.99% for MSTY.

AUMI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.09 vs -0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AUMI and MSTY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer