AUMI vs. MSTY
AUMI (Themes Gold Miners ETF) and MSTY (YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AUMI is a Gold fund tracking the Solactive Global Pure Gold Miners Index, while MSTY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax. AUMI is passively managed, while MSTY is actively managed. Over the past year, AUMI returned 51.93% vs -57.30% for MSTY. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AUMI charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for MSTY.
Performance
AUMI vs. MSTY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AUMI achieves a -3.13% return, which is significantly higher than MSTY's -8.55% return.
AUMI
- 1D
- 1.05%
- 1M
- -2.87%
- YTD
- -3.13%
- 6M
- 2.96%
- 1Y
- 51.93%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSTY
- 1D
- -8.50%
- 1M
- -20.82%
- YTD
- -8.55%
- 6M
- -19.25%
- 1Y
- -57.30%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AUMI vs. MSTY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
AUMI Themes Gold Miners ETF | -3.13% | 164.18% | 48.17% |
MSTY YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF | -8.55% | -42.71% | 200.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between AUMI and MSTY is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 2024 | 0.18 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AUMI vs. MSTY — Risk / Return Rank
AUMI
MSTY
AUMI vs. MSTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Themes Gold Miners ETF (AUMI) and YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (MSTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AUMI | MSTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.09 | -0.96 | +2.05 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.54 | -1.53 | +3.08 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 0.83 | +0.38 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.97 | -0.79 | +2.76 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.11 | -1.22 | +6.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AUMI | MSTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.09 | -0.96 | +2.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.60 | 0.31 | +1.29 |
Drawdowns
AUMI vs. MSTY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AUMI drawdown since its inception was -31.88%, smaller than the maximum MSTY drawdown of -71.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AUMI and MSTY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AUMI | MSTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.88% | -71.79% | +39.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.88% | -71.79% | +39.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.12% | -64.04% | +36.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.02% | -26.01% | +18.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.32% | 46.68% | -34.36% |
Volatility
AUMI vs. MSTY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Themes Gold Miners ETF (AUMI) is 14.29%, while YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (MSTY) has a volatility of 16.65%. This indicates that AUMI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AUMI | MSTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.29% | 16.65% | -2.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.44% | 48.38% | -9.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 48.37% | 60.11% | -11.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.56% | 71.83% | -30.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.56% | 71.83% | -30.27% |
AUMI vs. MSTY - Expense Ratio Comparison
AUMI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than MSTY's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
AUMI vs. MSTY - Dividend Comparison
AUMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, less than MSTY's 251.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
AUMI Themes Gold Miners ETF | 0.89% | 0.86% | 1.84% |
MSTY YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF | 251.24% | 294.61% | 104.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AUMI and MSTY have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MSTY has higher volatility (16.65%) compared to AUMI (14.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AUMI dropped -31.88% vs MSTY's -71.79%.
On 1-year performance, AUMI leads with 51.93% vs -57.30% for MSTY. On fees, AUMI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, AUMI has been the lower-risk option at 14.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, AUMI has performed better with a 51.93% return vs -57.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AUMI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for MSTY.
MSTY has the higher dividend yield at 251.24%, compared with 0.89% for AUMI.
AUMI is categorized as Gold, while MSTY is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Themes and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for AUMI and 0.99% for MSTY.
AUMI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.09 vs -0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AUMI and MSTY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer