AUMI vs. RING
Compare and contrast key facts about Themes Gold Miners ETF (AUMI) and iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING).
AUMI and RING are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AUMI is a passively managed fund by Themes that tracks the performance of the Solactive Global Pure Gold Miners Index. It was launched on Dec 12, 2023. RING is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI Select Gold Miners Investable Market Index. It was launched on Jan 31, 2012. Both AUMI and RING are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: AUMI or RING.
Correlation
The correlation between AUMI and RING is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
AUMI vs. RING - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
AUMI:
1.52
RING:
1.07
AUMI:
2.02
RING:
1.55
AUMI:
1.25
RING:
1.19
AUMI:
2.91
RING:
0.63
AUMI:
7.26
RING:
3.83
AUMI:
7.12%
RING:
9.04%
AUMI:
33.80%
RING:
32.22%
AUMI:
-17.71%
RING:
-79.48%
AUMI:
-8.15%
RING:
-31.42%
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with AUMI having a 7.66% return and RING slightly lower at 7.54%.
AUMI
7.66%
4.88%
7.43%
45.72%
N/A
N/A
RING
7.54%
0.63%
-4.52%
31.18%
6.97%
6.72%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AUMI vs. RING - Expense Ratio Comparison
AUMI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than RING's 0.39% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
AUMI vs. RING — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
AUMI
RING
AUMI vs. RING - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Themes Gold Miners ETF (AUMI) and iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
AUMI vs. RING - Dividend Comparison
AUMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.71%, more than RING's 1.33% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AUMI Themes Gold Miners ETF | 1.71% | 1.84% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RING iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF | 1.33% | 1.43% | 2.01% | 2.29% | 2.38% | 0.82% | 0.83% | 0.70% | 0.42% | 1.42% | 0.97% | 0.85% |
Drawdowns
AUMI vs. RING - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AUMI drawdown since its inception was -17.71%, smaller than the maximum RING drawdown of -79.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AUMI and RING. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
AUMI vs. RING - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Themes Gold Miners ETF (AUMI) is 8.93%, while iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING) has a volatility of 9.58%. This indicates that AUMI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RING based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.