AUMI vs. KEMQ
Compare and contrast key facts about Themes Gold Miners ETF (AUMI) and KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF (KEMQ).
AUMI and KEMQ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AUMI is a passively managed fund by Themes that tracks the performance of the Solactive Global Pure Gold Miners Index. It was launched on Dec 12, 2023. KEMQ is a passively managed fund by CICC that tracks the performance of the Solactive Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index. It was launched on Oct 11, 2017. Both AUMI and KEMQ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
AUMI vs. KEMQ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AUMI vs. KEMQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AUMI Themes Gold Miners ETF | 10.53% | 164.18% | 30.61% | 4.25% |
KEMQ KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF | -8.37% | 56.28% | 13.81% | 2.13% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AUMI achieves a 10.53% return, which is significantly higher than KEMQ's -8.37% return.
AUMI
- 1D
- 5.17%
- 1M
- -16.46%
- YTD
- 10.53%
- 6M
- 26.21%
- 1Y
- 116.15%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KEMQ
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- -9.19%
- YTD
- -8.37%
- 6M
- -11.06%
- 1Y
- 26.81%
- 3Y*
- 16.47%
- 5Y*
- -6.05%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AUMI vs. KEMQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
AUMI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than KEMQ's 0.60% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
AUMI vs. KEMQ — Risk / Return Rank
AUMI
KEMQ
AUMI vs. KEMQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Themes Gold Miners ETF (AUMI) and KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF (KEMQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AUMI | KEMQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.35 | 0.99 | +1.36 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.57 | 1.49 | +1.08 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.19 | +0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.66 | 1.27 | +2.39 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.93 | 4.14 | +8.79 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AUMI | KEMQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.35 | 0.99 | +1.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.19 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.01 | 0.00 | +2.01 |
Correlation
The correlation between AUMI and KEMQ is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
AUMI vs. KEMQ - Dividend Comparison
AUMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%, less than KEMQ's 5.75% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AUMI Themes Gold Miners ETF | 0.78% | 0.86% | 1.84% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
KEMQ KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF | 5.75% | 5.27% | 0.73% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.28% | 2.28% | 1.76% |
Drawdowns
AUMI vs. KEMQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AUMI drawdown since its inception was -31.88%, smaller than the maximum KEMQ drawdown of -70.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AUMI and KEMQ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AUMI | KEMQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.88% | -70.72% | +38.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.88% | -21.94% | -9.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -66.39% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.84% | -38.46% | +21.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.00% | -35.75% | +29.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.03% | 6.73% | +2.30% |
Volatility
AUMI vs. KEMQ - Volatility Comparison
Themes Gold Miners ETF (AUMI) has a higher volatility of 18.77% compared to KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF (KEMQ) at 10.25%. This indicates that AUMI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KEMQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AUMI | KEMQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.77% | 10.25% | +8.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.65% | 19.65% | +21.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.65% | 27.20% | +22.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.38% | 31.61% | +9.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.38% | 29.54% | +11.84% |