AUGO vs. EQT

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

AUGO (Aura Minerals Inc. Common Shares) and EQT (EQT Corporation) are both stocks. AUGO operates in Gold (Basic Materials), while EQT operates in Oil & Gas E&P (Energy). At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

AUGO vs. EQT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aura Minerals Inc. Common Shares (AUGO) and EQT Corporation (EQT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AUGO achieves a 22.99% return, which is significantly higher than EQT's -2.55% return.

AUGO

• 1D: 7.62%
• 1M: -22.38%
• YTD: 22.99%
• 6M: 33.09%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EQT

• 1D: 1.45%
• 1M: -7.13%
• YTD: -2.55%
• 6M: -6.00%
• 1Y: -5.35%
• 3Y*: 11.65%
• 5Y*: 19.29%
• 10Y*: 3.39%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AUGO vs. EQT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AUGO Aura Minerals Inc. Common Shares	22.99%	111.07%
EQT EQT Corporation	-2.55%	-7.41%

Correlation

The correlation between AUGO and EQT is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2025	0.12

Fundamentals

Market Cap AUGO : $5.04B EQT : $32.47B
EPS AUGO : $1.10 EQT : $5.40
PE Ratio AUGO : 55.27 EQT : 9.61
PS Ratio AUGO : 4.31 EQT : 3.21
PB Ratio AUGO : 16.69 EQT : 1.29
Total Revenue (TTM) AUGO : $1.14B EQT : $10.03B
Gross Profit (TTM) AUGO : $644.49M EQT : $6.43B
EBITDA (TTM) AUGO : $394.37M EQT : $7.48B

Return for Risk

AUGO vs. EQT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AUGO

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

EQT

EQT Risk / Return Rank: 34
EQT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
EQT Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
EQT Omega Ratio Rank: 32
EQT Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
EQT Martin Ratio Rank: 35

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AUGO vs. EQT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aura Minerals Inc. Common Shares (AUGO) and EQT Corporation (EQT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AUGO	EQT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	-0.17	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	-0.01	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.00	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	-0.22	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	-0.47	—

Drawdowns

AUGO vs. EQT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AUGO drawdown since its inception was -50.65%, smaller than the maximum EQT drawdown of -91.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AUGO and EQT.

Drawdown Indicators

	AUGO	EQT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.65%	-91.51%	+40.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-24.42%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-31.62%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-42.56%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-88.28%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-43.63%	-23.32%	-20.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.38%	-23.34%	+13.96%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	11.47%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AUGO	EQT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	8.36%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	21.09%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	67.47%	32.56%	+34.91%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	67.47%	42.79%	+24.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	67.47%	48.90%	+18.57%

Dividends

AUGO vs. EQT - Dividend Comparison

AUGO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.70%, more than EQT's 1.26% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AUGO Aura Minerals Inc. Common Shares	3.70%	1.61%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
EQT EQT Corporation	1.26%	1.19%	1.37%	1.57%	1.63%	0.00%	0.24%	1.10%	0.42%	0.21%	0.18%	0.23%

Financials

AUGO vs. EQT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Aura Minerals Inc. Common Shares and EQT Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

AUGO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Aura Minerals Inc. Common Shares reported a gross profit of 193.50M and revenue of 382.61M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 50.6%.

EQT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EQT Corporation reported a gross profit of 3.32B and revenue of 3.38B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 98.4%.

AUGO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Aura Minerals Inc. Common Shares reported an operating income of 172.35M and revenue of 382.61M, resulting in an operating margin of 45.1%.

EQT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EQT Corporation reported an operating income of 2.04B and revenue of 3.38B, resulting in an operating margin of 60.3%.

AUGO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Aura Minerals Inc. Common Shares reported a net income of 95.16M and revenue of 382.61M, resulting in a net margin of 24.9%.

EQT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EQT Corporation reported a net income of 1.55B and revenue of 3.38B, resulting in a net margin of 46.0%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AUGO and EQT in my portfolio?

AUGO and EQT have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.