ATMP vs. SE
ATMP (Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN) is MLPs fund tracking the CIBC Atlas Select MLP VWAP, while SE (Sea Limited) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, ATMP returned 15.05%/yr vs -21.47%/yr for SE. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ATMP vs. SE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ATMP achieves a 20.60% return, which is significantly higher than SE's -34.98% return.
ATMP
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- -3.30%
- YTD
- 20.60%
- 6M
- 20.43%
- 1Y
- 18.09%
- 3Y*
- 21.55%
- 5Y*
- 15.05%
- 10Y*
- 5.20%
SE
- 1D
- -3.21%
- 1M
- -6.10%
- YTD
- -34.98%
- 6M
- -33.66%
- 1Y
- -46.28%
- 3Y*
- 8.08%
- 5Y*
- -21.47%
- 10Y*
- —
ATMP vs. SE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATMP Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN | 20.60% | 1.73% | 31.66% | 14.51% | 20.71% | 33.06% | -34.39% | 0.39% | -14.55% | -0.33% |
SE Sea Limited | -34.98% | 20.24% | 161.98% | -22.16% | -76.74% | 12.39% | 394.90% | 255.30% | -15.08% | -17.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between ATMP and SE is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2017 | 0.22 |
The correlation between ATMP and SE shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.22 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ATMP vs. SE — Risk / Return Rank
ATMP
SE
ATMP vs. SE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP) and Sea Limited (SE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ATMP | SE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 0.83 | +0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.53 | -0.77 | +3.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.89 | -1.27 | +7.16 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ATMP vs. SE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ATMP drawdown since its inception was -80.86%, smaller than the maximum SE drawdown of -90.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATMP and SE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ATMP | SE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.86% | -90.51% | +9.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.30% | -60.22% | +52.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.48% | -60.22% | +43.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.98% | -90.51% | +67.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -75.66% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.61% | -77.40% | +71.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.08% | -44.10% | +13.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.13% | 36.57% | -33.44% |
Volatility
ATMP vs. SE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP) is 5.64%, while Sea Limited (SE) has a volatility of 14.69%. This indicates that ATMP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ATMP | SE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.64% | 14.69% | -9.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.99% | 38.05% | -27.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.18% | 50.74% | -36.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.25% | 64.13% | -41.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.67% | 62.59% | -34.92% |
Dividends
ATMP vs. SE - Dividend Comparison
Neither ATMP nor SE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ATMP and SE have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SE has higher volatility (14.69%) compared to ATMP (5.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ATMP dropped -80.86% vs SE's -90.51%.
ATMP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.30 vs -0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ATMP and SE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer