ATMP vs. MLPB
ATMP (Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN) and MLPB (ETRACS Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index ETN Series B) are both MLPs funds - ATMP tracks the CIBC Atlas Select MLP VWAP while MLPB tracks the Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ATMP returned 4.90%/yr vs 10.20%/yr for MLPB. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ATMP charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for MLPB.
Performance
ATMP vs. MLPB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with ATMP having a 20.02% return and MLPB slightly lower at 19.72%. Over the past 10 years, ATMP has underperformed MLPB with an annualized return of 4.90%, while MLPB has yielded a comparatively higher 10.20% annualized return.
ATMP
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- -2.32%
- YTD
- 20.02%
- 6M
- 19.57%
- 1Y
- 18.01%
- 3Y*
- 21.17%
- 5Y*
- 15.87%
- 10Y*
- 4.90%
MLPB
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- -0.42%
- YTD
- 19.72%
- 6M
- 18.24%
- 1Y
- 20.60%
- 3Y*
- 22.21%
- 5Y*
- 19.42%
- 10Y*
- 10.20%
ATMP vs. MLPB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATMP Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN | 20.02% | 1.73% | 31.66% | 14.51% | 20.71% | 33.06% | -34.39% | 0.39% | -14.55% | -11.89% |
MLPB ETRACS Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index ETN Series B | 19.72% | 7.40% | 25.53% | 22.01% | 30.22% | 39.42% | -30.80% | 5.69% | -8.79% | -9.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between ATMP and MLPB is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2015 | 0.73 |
The correlation between ATMP and MLPB shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (all time) to 0.90 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ATMP vs. MLPB — Risk / Return Rank
ATMP
MLPB
ATMP vs. MLPB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP) and ETRACS Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index ETN Series B (MLPB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ATMP | MLPB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.31 | 1.54 | -0.23 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.87 | 2.16 | -0.29 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.26 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.51 | 2.14 | +0.38 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.16 | 6.60 | -0.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ATMP | MLPB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.31 | 1.54 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 | 0.97 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.18 | 0.37 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.09 | 0.24 | -0.15 |
Drawdowns
ATMP vs. MLPB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ATMP drawdown since its inception was -80.86%, which is greater than MLPB's maximum drawdown of -71.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATMP and MLPB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ATMP | MLPB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.86% | -71.93% | -8.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.26% | -9.68% | +2.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.48% | -16.49% | +0.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.98% | -20.41% | -2.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -75.66% | -71.93% | -3.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.07% | -4.69% | -1.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.15% | -14.83% | -16.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.95% | 3.13% | -0.18% |
Volatility
ATMP vs. MLPB - Volatility Comparison
Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP) and ETRACS Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index ETN Series B (MLPB) have volatilities of 5.61% and 5.40%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ATMP | MLPB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.61% | 5.40% | +0.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.72% | 10.05% | +0.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.00% | 13.51% | +0.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.23% | 20.03% | +2.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.68% | 28.11% | -0.43% |
ATMP vs. MLPB - Expense Ratio Comparison
ATMP has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than MLPB's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
ATMP vs. MLPB - Dividend Comparison
ATMP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MLPB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.85%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATMP Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MLPB ETRACS Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index ETN Series B | 5.85% | 6.51% | 5.95% | 6.37% | 6.00% | 6.98% | 11.93% | 7.98% | 8.11% | 7.23% | 6.85% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ATMP and MLPB have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ATMP has higher volatility (5.61%) compared to MLPB (5.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ATMP dropped -80.86% vs MLPB's -71.93%.
On 10-year performance, MLPB leads with 10.20% vs 4.90% for ATMP. On fees, MLPB is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, MLPB has been the lower-risk option at 5.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, MLPB has performed better with a 10.20% return vs 4.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MLPB is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for ATMP.
MLPB has the higher dividend yield at 5.85%, compared with 0.00% for ATMP.
ATMP tracks CIBC Atlas Select MLP VWAP, while MLPB tracks Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: Barclays Capital and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for ATMP and 0.85% for MLPB.
MLPB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ATMP and MLPB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer