PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ATMP vs. MLPB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ATMP vs. MLPB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP) and ETRACS Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index ETN Series B (MLPB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with ATMP having a 20.02% return and MLPB slightly lower at 19.72%. Over the past 10 years, ATMP has underperformed MLPB with an annualized return of 4.90%, while MLPB has yielded a comparatively higher 10.20% annualized return.


ATMP

1D
0.07%
1M
-2.32%
YTD
20.02%
6M
19.57%
1Y
18.01%
3Y*
21.17%
5Y*
15.87%
10Y*
4.90%

MLPB

1D
-0.05%
1M
-0.42%
YTD
19.72%
6M
18.24%
1Y
20.60%
3Y*
22.21%
5Y*
19.42%
10Y*
10.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ATMP vs. MLPB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ATMP
Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN
20.02%1.73%31.66%14.51%20.71%33.06%-34.39%0.39%-14.55%-11.89%
MLPB
ETRACS Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index ETN Series B
19.72%7.40%25.53%22.01%30.22%39.42%-30.80%5.69%-8.79%-9.71%

Correlation

The correlation between ATMP and MLPB is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2015

0.73

The correlation between ATMP and MLPB shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (all time) to 0.90 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ATMP vs. MLPB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ATMP
ATMP Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
ATMP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ATMP Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
ATMP Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
ATMP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
ATMP Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

MLPB
MLPB Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
MLPB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MLPB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
MLPB Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
MLPB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
MLPB Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ATMP vs. MLPB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP) and ETRACS Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index ETN Series B (MLPB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ATMPMLPBDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.31

1.54

-0.23

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.87

2.16

-0.29

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.26

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.51

2.14

+0.38

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.16

6.60

-0.44

ATMP vs. MLPB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ATMP Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is comparable to the MLPB Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ATMP and MLPB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ATMPMLPBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.31

1.54

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

0.97

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

0.37

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.09

0.24

-0.15

Drawdowns

ATMP vs. MLPB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ATMP drawdown since its inception was -80.86%, which is greater than MLPB's maximum drawdown of -71.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATMP and MLPB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ATMPMLPBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.86%

-71.93%

-8.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.26%

-9.68%

+2.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.48%

-16.49%

+0.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.98%

-20.41%

-2.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-75.66%

-71.93%

-3.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.07%

-4.69%

-1.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.15%

-14.83%

-16.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.95%

3.13%

-0.18%

Volatility

ATMP vs. MLPB - Volatility Comparison

Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP) and ETRACS Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index ETN Series B (MLPB) have volatilities of 5.61% and 5.40%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ATMPMLPBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.61%

5.40%

+0.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.72%

10.05%

+0.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.00%

13.51%

+0.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.23%

20.03%

+2.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.68%

28.11%

-0.43%

ATMP vs. MLPB - Expense Ratio Comparison

ATMP has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than MLPB's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

ATMP vs. MLPB - Dividend Comparison

ATMP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MLPB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.85%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
ATMP
Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MLPB
ETRACS Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index ETN Series B
5.85%6.51%5.95%6.37%6.00%6.98%11.93%7.98%8.11%7.23%6.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


ATMP and MLPB have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ATMP has higher volatility (5.61%) compared to MLPB (5.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ATMP dropped -80.86% vs MLPB's -71.93%.

On 10-year performance, MLPB leads with 10.20% vs 4.90% for ATMP. On fees, MLPB is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, MLPB has been the lower-risk option at 5.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, MLPB has performed better with a 10.20% return vs 4.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MLPB is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for ATMP.

MLPB has the higher dividend yield at 5.85%, compared with 0.00% for ATMP.

ATMP tracks CIBC Atlas Select MLP VWAP, while MLPB tracks Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: Barclays Capital and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for ATMP and 0.85% for MLPB.

MLPB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ATMP and MLPB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer