MLPB vs. MLPX
MLPB (ETRACS Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index ETN Series B) and MLPX (Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF) are both MLPs funds - MLPB tracks the Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index while MLPX tracks the Solactive MLP & Energy Infrastructure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MLPB returned 10.21%/yr vs 12.45%/yr for MLPX. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MLPB charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for MLPX.
Performance
MLPB vs. MLPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MLPB achieves a 19.79% return, which is significantly lower than MLPX's 24.08% return. Over the past 10 years, MLPB has underperformed MLPX with an annualized return of 10.21%, while MLPX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.45% annualized return.
MLPB
- 1D
- 1.09%
- 1M
- 0.21%
- YTD
- 19.79%
- 6M
- 19.70%
- 1Y
- 22.49%
- 3Y*
- 22.24%
- 5Y*
- 19.55%
- 10Y*
- 10.21%
MLPX
- 1D
- 2.03%
- 1M
- -0.98%
- YTD
- 24.08%
- 6M
- 25.26%
- 1Y
- 25.07%
- 3Y*
- 28.29%
- 5Y*
- 21.30%
- 10Y*
- 12.45%
MLPB vs. MLPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLPB ETRACS Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index ETN Series B | 19.79% | 7.40% | 25.53% | 22.01% | 30.22% | 39.42% | -30.80% | 5.69% | -8.79% | -9.71% |
MLPX Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF | 24.08% | 4.96% | 42.90% | 15.77% | 21.54% | 39.63% | -20.32% | 19.04% | -15.64% | -4.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between MLPB and MLPX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2015 | 0.70 |
The correlation between MLPB and MLPX shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (all time) to 0.88 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MLPB vs. MLPX — Risk / Return Rank
MLPB
MLPX
MLPB vs. MLPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index ETN Series B (MLPB) and Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (MLPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MLPB | MLPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.67 | 1.64 | +0.03 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.33 | 2.26 | +0.07 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.28 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.43 | 3.33 | -0.90 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.55 | 8.64 | -1.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MLPB | MLPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.67 | 1.64 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 | 1.07 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 | 0.47 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 0.35 | -0.12 |
Drawdowns
MLPB vs. MLPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MLPB drawdown since its inception was -71.93%, roughly equal to the maximum MLPX drawdown of -70.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPB and MLPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MLPB | MLPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.93% | -70.67% | -1.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.68% | -8.18% | -1.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.49% | -16.77% | +0.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.41% | -19.72% | -0.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -71.93% | -64.70% | -7.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.64% | -5.31% | +0.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.83% | -16.63% | +1.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.12% | 3.15% | -0.03% |
Volatility
MLPB vs. MLPX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ETRACS Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index ETN Series B (MLPB) is 5.43%, while Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (MLPX) has a volatility of 6.46%. This indicates that MLPB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MLPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MLPB | MLPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.43% | 6.46% | -1.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.05% | 11.83% | -1.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.53% | 15.45% | -1.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.03% | 20.08% | -0.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.11% | 26.50% | +1.61% |
MLPB vs. MLPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MLPB has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than MLPX's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
MLPB vs. MLPX - Dividend Comparison
MLPB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.85%, more than MLPX's 4.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLPB ETRACS Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index ETN Series B | 5.85% | 6.51% | 5.95% | 6.37% | 6.00% | 6.98% | 11.93% | 7.98% | 8.11% | 7.23% | 6.85% | 0.00% |
MLPX Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF | 4.13% | 4.88% | 4.30% | 5.22% | 5.23% | 5.98% | 8.32% | 5.78% | 5.77% | 4.36% | 5.50% | 4.81% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MLPB and MLPX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MLPX has higher volatility (6.46%) compared to MLPB (5.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MLPB dropped -71.93% vs MLPX's -70.67%.
On 10-year performance, MLPX leads with 12.45% vs 10.21% for MLPB. On fees, MLPX is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, MLPB has been the lower-risk option at 5.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, MLPX has performed better with a 12.45% return vs 10.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MLPX is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for MLPB.
MLPB has the higher dividend yield at 5.85%, compared with 4.13% for MLPX.
MLPB tracks Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index, while MLPX tracks Solactive MLP & Energy Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for MLPB and 0.45% for MLPX.
MLPB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.67 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MLPB and MLPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer