ATMP vs. AMTR

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

ATMP (Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN) and AMTR (ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Total Return Index ETN) are both MLPs funds - ATMP tracks the CIBC Atlas Select MLP VWAP while AMTR tracks the Alerian Midstream Energy Index. Both are passively managed. Their 0.77 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. ATMP charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for AMTR.

Performance

ATMP vs. AMTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP) and ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Total Return Index ETN (AMTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

ATMP

• 1D: 0.87%
• 1M: 5.19%
• 6M: 17.51%
• YTD: 26.22%
• 1Y: 23.85%
• 3Y*: 20.30%
• 5Y*: 18.49%
• 10Y*: 5.16%
• ALL TIME*: 2.84%

AMTR

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ATMP Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN	$521.25K	$462.49K	$511.48K

ATMP vs. AMTR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
ATMP Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN	26.22%	1.73%	31.66%	14.51%	20.71%	33.06%	18.81%
AMTR ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Total Return Index ETN	0.00%	0.00%	44.68%	12.75%	20.41%	36.99%	14.40%

Correlation

The correlation between ATMP and AMTR is 0.77, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.52
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.72
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2020	0.77

The correlation between ATMP and AMTR shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (3 years) to 0.77 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

ATMP vs. AMTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ATMP

ATMP Risk / Return Rank: 68
ATMP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
ATMP Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
ATMP Omega Ratio Rank: 65
ATMP Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
ATMP Martin Ratio Rank: 56

AMTR

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ATMP vs. AMTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP) and ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Total Return Index ETN (AMTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ATMP	AMTR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.60	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.27	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.81	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.57	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	ATMP	AMTR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-80.86%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.30%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.48%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.98%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-75.66%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.27%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-30.81%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.54%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ATMP	AMTR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.01%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.75%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.57%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.94%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.62%	—	—

ATMP vs. AMTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

ATMP has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than AMTR's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

ATMP vs. AMTR - Dividend Comparison

Neither ATMP nor AMTR has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ATMP and AMTR in my portfolio?

ATMP and AMTR have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ATMP or AMTR?

On fees, AMTR is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ATMP or AMTR?

AMTR is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for ATMP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ATMP or AMTR?

ATMP and AMTR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between ATMP and AMTR?

ATMP tracks CIBC Atlas Select MLP VWAP, while AMTR tracks Alerian Midstream Energy Index. They also come from different issuers: Barclays Capital and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for ATMP and 0.75% for AMTR.